by your own logic, wouldn't your reply to my post then "spur" more complaining on my part and make you just as guilty as i was for progessing the flame posts? i guess there is some logic there since i've obviously replied, but it's like saying that two people shouldn't argue a point because arguing only results in more arguing.
I can't believe that there are people that, after reading that entire article, the only thing that comes to their minds is "what moron would accept a damaged package"!! If you find that you don't like Katz's writing, why continue to read it and then complain about it? It seems that the true morons are the ones that haven't figured this out yet.
Oh, and for you flamers, Katz DIDN'T accept the damaged box. Read the article again, the package was at his house when he got home.
Slashdot Mirror
by your own logic, wouldn't your reply to my post then "spur" more complaining on my part and make you just as guilty as i was for progessing the flame posts? i guess there is some logic there since i've obviously replied, but it's like saying that two people shouldn't argue a point because arguing only results in more arguing.
I can't believe that there are people that, after reading that entire article, the only thing that comes to their minds is "what moron would accept a damaged package"!! If you find that you don't like Katz's writing, why continue to read it and then complain about it? It seems that the true morons are the ones that haven't figured this out yet.
Oh, and for you flamers, Katz DIDN'T accept the damaged box. Read the article again, the package was at his house when he got home.