John C. Dvorak had some fairly pointed comments regarding Internet Explorer in his article:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1952995,00.as p
I think he makes a great argument. For what little revenue IE brings to Microsoft, it costs a fortune in reputation, much less support costs. What is the business driver behind continued development of IE?
John C. Dvorak had some fairly pointed comments regarding Internet Explorer in his article: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1952995,00.as p
I think he makes a great argument. For what little revenue IE brings to Microsoft, it costs a fortune in reputation, much less support costs. What is the business driver behind continued development of IE?
Where was the upstream provider? I work for a backbone company, and we routinely nul route and ACL routes to our customers who are being DoS'ed.