1- Pentiun4 is crippled:
http://www.emulators.com/pentium4.htm
2-Single Athlon 1.3Ghz smokes dual P4Xeons 1.7Ghz
http://www.animationartist.com/2001/08_aug/reviews/polywell_133f.htm
3- G5: 'Motorola has announced two G5 processors, but both are aimed squarely at embedded applications and are unsuitable for desktop Macs - or portables, for that matter.'and that 'the company is pursuing a two-strand strategy: G5 becomes the company's high-end embedded family, while an evolving G4 continues to be targeted at desktop customers.'
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/39/23192.html Apple should compare PC's with Macs by taking the best of Macs (Dual 1Ghz G4) with the best of PC's (Dual 1.6Ghz AthlonMP)
I'm sorry to say this but Apple is misleading the whole world by comparing a Dual 1Ghz G4 with a single crippled 2Ghz P4, I wish they go bankrupt for this. >:(
Slashdot Mirror
1- Pentiun4 is crippled: http://www.emulators.com/pentium4.htms /polywell_133f.htm l
2-Single Athlon 1.3Ghz smokes dual P4Xeons 1.7Ghz http://www.animationartist.com/2001/08_aug/review
3- G5: 'Motorola has announced two G5 processors, but both are aimed squarely at embedded applications and are unsuitable for desktop Macs - or portables, for that matter.'and that 'the company is pursuing a two-strand strategy: G5 becomes the company's high-end embedded family, while an evolving G4 continues to be targeted at desktop customers.'
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/39/23192.htm
Apple should compare PC's with Macs by taking the best of Macs (Dual 1Ghz G4) with the best of PC's (Dual 1.6Ghz AthlonMP)
I'm sorry to say this but Apple is misleading the whole world by comparing a Dual 1Ghz G4 with a single crippled 2Ghz P4, I wish they go bankrupt for this. >:(