It allready boots up faster then either linux or windows
>2. Ease of use
It all depends on what you define as "Ease of Use" it's pretty easy to use for me.
>3. Better setup interface (auto probe of PC >hardware, setup hardware, if no drivers for
>hardware install modem or NIC and download
Well lets not turn it into another Windows or RedHat
>drivers via cvsup and complete setup using >xserver)
Well the purpose of the FreeBSD group is to make a good and stable OS, not to make it pretty
>4. One standard/exclusive window manager (kde, >gnome, something standard)
That's not FreeBSD's fault, yes X and window managers are bundled with FreeBSD but they are technically not part of the OS (FreeBSD team doesn't write/support X/KDE/etc.. code)
>6. One tool for driver/software tracking and >installation/removals
>7. One tool for system administration (printers, >servers, security, user administration, >updates,etc)
I'd rather see a 3rd party do that and let FreeBSD
programmers wory about more important things.
>1. Fast boot ups
It allready boots up faster then either linux or windows
>2. Ease of use
It all depends on what you define as "Ease of Use" it's pretty easy to use for me.
>3. Better setup interface (auto probe of PC >hardware, setup hardware, if no drivers for
>hardware install modem or NIC and download
Well lets not turn it into another Windows or RedHat
>drivers via cvsup and complete setup using >xserver)
Well the purpose of the FreeBSD group is to make a good and stable OS, not to make it pretty
>4. One standard/exclusive window manager (kde, >gnome, something standard)
That's not FreeBSD's fault, yes X and window managers are bundled with FreeBSD but they are technically not part of the OS (FreeBSD team doesn't write/support X/KDE/etc.. code)
>6. One tool for driver/software tracking and >installation/removals
>7. One tool for system administration (printers, >servers, security, user administration, >updates,etc)
I'd rather see a 3rd party do that and let FreeBSD
programmers wory about more important things.