I aggree.
Everyone knows that Linux -without the necessary adjustments - is like leaving a Ferrari with the door unlocked and the keys in the ignition. It's up to the administrator.
I found it interesting that the stats on the site showed that the Red Hat and Madrake distros both had increases in security holes over the last two years. Why do you think that is? Seems backward. Could one say that adding more capabilities and packaged programs to the OS make it less secure?
Slashdot Mirror
I aggree. Everyone knows that Linux -without the necessary adjustments - is like leaving a Ferrari with the door unlocked and the keys in the ignition. It's up to the administrator. I found it interesting that the stats on the site showed that the Red Hat and Madrake distros both had increases in security holes over the last two years. Why do you think that is? Seems backward. Could one say that adding more capabilities and packaged programs to the OS make it less secure?