Slashdot Mirror


User: mmurray

mmurray's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
3
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 3

  1. Re:Performance? Swap space?? on Run Your Firewall Halted for Extra Security · · Score: 1

    Figure I should toss in some info here: note that I posted a correction below. Given that the kernel isn't pageable, swap space won't ever be an issue.

    As far as CPU performance goes, I tested this on a 486DX/66, and I could run full 10Mb ethernet links saturated without any packet loss with a minimal ruleset (but running NAT [masquerading]).

    Thought that might be useful info... :)

  2. Re:Why run an OS at all? on Run Your Firewall Halted for Extra Security · · Score: 1

    Makes perfect sense to me... =)

    The only thing I'd like to say about this idea is that it's not accessible. The thing I liked best about the ease of doing this on RH is that even a junior SA could perform this task with relative ease.

    Flashing BIOS with specialized code is a more difficult task, and probably isn't something that your average admin is going to undertake (especially for a specialized project).

    My $0.02 on this one... :)

  3. Correction on Run Your Firewall Halted for Extra Security · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hi all...

    As the author of the article being discussed, I wanted to point out one of my own errors. I discussed the lack of swap-space as a limitation to the setup; however, the linux kernel isn't pageable, so swap space would have no effect on the performance of the firewalling code.

    I've had a few people point that out, so I wanted to post that correction publically.

    Feel free to email me at mmurray@ncircle.com if you have questions or commments... :)

    Mike