Slashdot Mirror


User: dnhll

dnhll's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5

  1. Re:Stupid for MS on More On IBM's Next-Gen Xbox Chipset Win · · Score: 1

    ahh, but if the PS3 is PPC based, as it is widely speculated, then this will make it much easier for 3rd party game vendors to port their PS3 games to the XBox platform...(and vice versa) but give sony marketshare this will be a net win for M$

  2. Re: Plus 64-bit advantage on Apple Is Buyer of New 64-Bit IBM Chips · · Score: 1

    I imagine the Power4 team has some decent compilers. Their customers care about performance not MHz

  3. Re:This is "anti-competitive"? on Compuware Brings IBM to Antitrust Court · · Score: 2, Insightful

    that is a horrible analogy

  4. Re:SPARC's death *greatly exagerated* on What's Next in CPU Land after Itanium? · · Score: 1

    Obviously architecture is important, but distance between trasistors equals time, and in the gigahertz range it starts to become a serious problem, more so than it has ever been. I don't think Sparc is dead yet, it is just very difficult to compete against Intel's resources. Sun's design has to be it that much better.

  5. Re:SPARC's death *greatly exagerated* on What's Next in CPU Land after Itanium? · · Score: 1

    One of Sun's problems is that they don't have a world class Fab. And high end logic is not TI's game, not like Intel or IBM. Granted speed isn't everything, but you start behind the 8 ball when your technology isn't as good.