So, what about AMD's architecture? I'm assuming that rendering is read intensive, but not heavy on writes or interthread comms, and AMD provides separate memory banks and, I assume, a more advanced caching setup.
Whereas, the two Koreas have a history of armed conflict and rather heavy fortification. Was half the soviet army sitting on the other side of the wall? Because that's how NK behaves.
It's a prototype. If I were to deploy this somewhere, I'd get a bigger ammo box and probably add some stone/metal armor around the device to limit the ability of a 50 bmg (assuming that the NK army has any). Never mind that attacking a SK installation would likely break the cease fire. What's the point of that?
In that case, Id argue (not being a lawyer) that the appropriate loss would be what they'd have to pay to have that writtne or license the code, since they had no legal right to the code.
Then they argue that this is not a copyright case, but a contract case? I know that lawyers speak a different language than the rest of us, but... can someone point out my error?
I'm envisioning the defense attorney taking potshots, seeing what'll hit. As for the copyright/contract case, they seem to be arguing that since the stuff is distributed under the GPL, they accepted that license and are now accused of violating it. Since ISTR that the GPL has a clause stating that violating the contract voids it, wouldn't it still be a copyright case?
Easy - build a computer that generates paper ballots and puts them in a hopper after voter verification. The hopper is then put in a counting machine which behaves much like before because it is pretty much identical to what we already have. Note the very limited use of computers.
Amused that someone modded that blather insightful. The difference here is that financial transactions have an audit trail and can be traced back to who paid what for every of 10 million transactions. Voting is necessarily secret, and that alone changes things radically. Never mind that in both cases, we have to depend on corruptible people to get things done.
For example, suddently there's a spate of local crimes in the neighborhood that seem to be happening on the edges of the parkland, and you don't want to be liable.
In keeping with the analogy, you need to put up a fence or something to demarcate the boundary or you can't charge them with trespassing. How are they supposed to know where your property line is?
history of people trespassing without much consequence doesn't vacate the trespass laws or your property rights
Sure does. You alluded to it yourself. In some places, it only takes about a year.
And I meant that they did have the concept, but didn't have the guns, so we took it anyway. Basically, it's like me shooting you and claiming your house for myself.
OK, how about instead of using the "breaking in" analogy, we just use the good old "trespassing" analogy?
Fine by me. Someone owns an acre of grassland adjacent to a park. There are no signs marking the border, and you walk through it on a regular basis. One day, the owner gets pissed and you are charged with tresspassing.
Given a choice between living in Singapore and not having completely free speech, versus living in Iraq and being able to say whatever you want, almost everybody will choose Singapore.
Of course, if you then offer them some place like Vancouver, BC, guess where they'll go? You really can't compare a fascist regime with clean streets to a warzone and expect valid results.
If you can't bother to tell people that this is private (the moral equivalent of installing a fence with a gate), then yes, you are inviting everyone to use your router. I don't care to hear anyone bitching that it's too technical, either. A subliterate moron could figure this stuff out.
What the hell are you talking about? We didn't respect their property because we had guns. It's nothing to do with misunderstanding - we had the power and we used it.
Slashdot Mirror
So, what about AMD's architecture? I'm assuming that rendering is read intensive, but not heavy on writes or interthread comms, and AMD provides separate memory banks and, I assume, a more advanced caching setup.
That won't work. The algorithm is serially dependent - this means that the maximum parallelization boost is probably only about 30%.
You know what I'd do if I had $1000 spare? Four cores at once.
The market haas since grown somewhat.
Why, does the app saturate the IO bandwidth?
Whereas, the two Koreas have a history of armed conflict and rather heavy fortification. Was half the soviet army sitting on the other side of the wall? Because that's how NK behaves.
It's a prototype. If I were to deploy this somewhere, I'd get a bigger ammo box and probably add some stone/metal armor around the device to limit the ability of a 50 bmg (assuming that the NK army has any). Never mind that attacking a SK installation would likely break the cease fire. What's the point of that?
More to the point, how can someone represent a physical threat to a booby trap?
Just because the war ended
The war didn't end. That requires a surrender or peace treaty.
In that case, Id argue (not being a lawyer) that the appropriate loss would be what they'd have to pay to have that writtne or license the code, since they had no legal right to the code.
Then they argue that this is not a copyright case, but a contract case? I know that lawyers speak a different language than the rest of us, but... can someone point out my error?
I'm envisioning the defense attorney taking potshots, seeing what'll hit. As for the copyright/contract case, they seem to be arguing that since the stuff is distributed under the GPL, they accepted that license and are now accused of violating it. Since ISTR that the GPL has a clause stating that violating the contract voids it, wouldn't it still be a copyright case?
So, how do you get the 2 24" monitors to play nicely in one X server?
So what if I'm using windows and it autoassociates with your network because you never bothered to slap on a password?
Easy - build a computer that generates paper ballots and puts them in a hopper after voter verification. The hopper is then put in a counting machine which behaves much like before because it is pretty much identical to what we already have. Note the very limited use of computers.
Betcha it's obvious where your yard starts. Not so in this case.
Fixed that for you. Now how do you feel?
Amused that someone modded that blather insightful. The difference here is that financial transactions have an audit trail and can be traced back to who paid what for every of 10 million transactions. Voting is necessarily secret, and that alone changes things radically. Never mind that in both cases, we have to depend on corruptible people to get things done.
Bullshit. You can hold me responsible for the end result once I have the power to decide what that is.
For example, suddently there's a spate of local crimes in the neighborhood that seem to be happening on the edges of the parkland, and you don't want to be liable.
In keeping with the analogy, you need to put up a fence or something to demarcate the boundary or you can't charge them with trespassing. How are they supposed to know where your property line is?
history of people trespassing without much consequence doesn't vacate the trespass laws or your property rights
Sure does. You alluded to it yourself. In some places, it only takes about a year.
And I meant that they did have the concept, but didn't have the guns, so we took it anyway. Basically, it's like me shooting you and claiming your house for myself.
OK, how about instead of using the "breaking in" analogy, we just use the good old "trespassing" analogy?
Fine by me. Someone owns an acre of grassland adjacent to a park. There are no signs marking the border, and you walk through it on a regular basis. One day, the owner gets pissed and you are charged with tresspassing.
Given a choice between living in Singapore and not having completely free speech, versus living in Iraq and being able to say whatever you want, almost everybody will choose Singapore.
Of course, if you then offer them some place like Vancouver, BC, guess where they'll go? You really can't compare a fascist regime with clean streets to a warzone and expect valid results.
If you can't bother to tell people that this is private (the moral equivalent of installing a fence with a gate), then yes, you are inviting everyone to use your router. I don't care to hear anyone bitching that it's too technical, either. A subliterate moron could figure this stuff out.
What the hell are you talking about? We didn't respect their property because we had guns. It's nothing to do with misunderstanding - we had the power and we used it.
Expensive locks are easier. Only exception I can think if is possible Medeco, with the rotating pins.
Have you ever tried? Personally, I'd like to do so just to see if it works.