I agree that I don't want my media being 1 cubic centimeter. I've already lost a CD or two, and can you imagine what a pain it'll be to try to write a legible label on this thing?
Nonetheless, I wouldn't mind having say a 5cmx5cmx0.5cm cartridge with 12.5 gigs of storage on it. Hell, even if storage doesn't grow linearly, I'd be mighty happy with a 5cmx5cmx0.5cm catridge that could store 1 gig of data, let alone something reasonable like 10 or 12 gigs.
Since it's solid state, I'd imagine we could cover the "fragile" parts in some sort of casing so that dropping and greasy fingers wouldn't be an issue.
"Repeat my answer each time this occurs" != "Yes to all". If the user checks that box, and clicks on skip, then all duplicates will be skipped.
This is also not the same as cancel, because cancel would stop the copying/moving process right then and there, whereas "Skip to all" would continue copying files as long as there were no duplicates (and simply skip the cases where there are duplicates.)
Slashdot Mirror
I agree that I don't want my media being 1 cubic centimeter. I've already lost a CD or two, and can you imagine what a pain it'll be to try to write a legible label on this thing? Nonetheless, I wouldn't mind having say a 5cmx5cmx0.5cm cartridge with 12.5 gigs of storage on it. Hell, even if storage doesn't grow linearly, I'd be mighty happy with a 5cmx5cmx0.5cm catridge that could store 1 gig of data, let alone something reasonable like 10 or 12 gigs. Since it's solid state, I'd imagine we could cover the "fragile" parts in some sort of casing so that dropping and greasy fingers wouldn't be an issue.
"Repeat my answer each time this occurs" != "Yes to all". If the user checks that box, and clicks on skip, then all duplicates will be skipped.
This is also not the same as cancel, because cancel would stop the copying/moving process right then and there, whereas "Skip to all" would continue copying files as long as there were no duplicates (and simply skip the cases where there are duplicates.)