I do not agree. Simply because it presents a logical problem - ie what does SQL Server Utilize to BE a database... thats right, a filesystem. and NOT OFS.
so it is a bit like putting the cart before the horse i guess you could say --- doing as you sugest would require a simultanious implemation of SQL Server and OFS. as they are dependent on eachother. A more plausable situation might be to first impliment the low level details of organizing the FS, and then on top of that allowing the kernel, or something, to use the SQL Server routines to search the filesystem. SQL Server as it stands now is too dependent on the MS filesystems to be as simple as SQL Server 2003 = OFS.
Slashdot Mirror
I do not agree. Simply because it presents a logical problem - ie what does SQL Server Utilize to BE a database... thats right, a filesystem. and NOT OFS. so it is a bit like putting the cart before the horse i guess you could say --- doing as you sugest would require a simultanious implemation of SQL Server and OFS. as they are dependent on eachother. A more plausable situation might be to first impliment the low level details of organizing the FS, and then on top of that allowing the kernel, or something, to use the SQL Server routines to search the filesystem. SQL Server as it stands now is too dependent on the MS filesystems to be as simple as SQL Server 2003 = OFS.