bah. it makes TOTAL sense that a company would want you to build a solution in a language they knew the best.
i'm sure your code NEVER has to be maintained, that it was absolutely perfect and no new features would ever be added down the road. supporting more languages means more cost for any development shop
Re:This guy wasn't there, huh? :)
on
.NET at JavaONE
·
· Score: 1
lemme put this into perspective. i am at teched right now, this very second. in the past 3 days, there has been no java or sun bashing. none. in fact, in the current session that i should be paying more attention to instead of typing this, its a comparison of J2EE architecture vs.NET vs COM/ASP.
i wonder what will influence your companies CEO more when making technology decisions: well though out arguments, or some.DAT c-flat buttons?
you call this dude a "fucking moron" for not comparing "apples to apples" when he should be comparing MS to BEA? how much are BEA products when compared to MS? thats right.
IIS and COM+ are included with windows 2000. VisualStudio.NET EE is only a couple thousand bucks. BEA alone is gonna set you back 10 grand. so thats not apples to apples either dumbass. the problem with you open source retards is you cant make any other distinction than "costs money" vs "free." regardless of how much money your spending, or how complicated your "free" development environment is.
Slashdot Mirror
bah. it makes TOTAL sense that a company would want you to build a solution in a language they knew the best. i'm sure your code NEVER has to be maintained, that it was absolutely perfect and no new features would ever be added down the road. supporting more languages means more cost for any development shop
lemme put this into perspective. i am at teched right now, this very second. in the past 3 days, there has been no java or sun bashing. none. in fact, in the current session that i should be paying more attention to instead of typing this, its a comparison of J2EE architecture vs .NET vs COM/ASP.
i wonder what will influence your companies CEO more when making technology decisions: well though out arguments, or some .DAT c-flat buttons?
you call this dude a "fucking moron" for not comparing "apples to apples" when he should be comparing MS to BEA? how much are BEA products when compared to MS? thats right.
IIS and COM+ are included with windows 2000. VisualStudio.NET EE is only a couple thousand bucks. BEA alone is gonna set you back 10 grand. so thats not apples to apples either dumbass. the problem with you open source retards is you cant make any other distinction than "costs money" vs "free." regardless of how much money your spending, or how complicated your "free" development environment is.