the 'bluetooth is dead' articles always make me wonder why is it then that everyday (literally) one sees more bt-enabled devices.
i live in a bt bubble: t68i paired with the mac (sms/answering machine/dialer/remote control) and a bt headset, palm tungsten also paired with the mac (just because i can) and on the road with the t68i. i know people who use bt as an alternative to more expensive wifi, and are quite happy with it. i also use bt to exchange vcards with everyone in the office (hard to find anyone who doesn't have a bt-enabled phone).
so yes, somebody should tell these people that it's 2003 now.
the 'bluetooth is dead' articles always make me wonder why is it then that everyday (literally) one sees more bt-enabled devices.
i live in a bt bubble: t68i paired with the mac (sms/answering machine/dialer/remote control) and a bt headset, palm tungsten also paired with the mac (just because i can) and on the road with the t68i. i know people who use bt as an alternative to more expensive wifi, and are quite happy with it. i also use bt to exchange vcards with everyone in the office (hard to find anyone who doesn't have a bt-enabled phone).
so yes, somebody should tell these people that it's 2003 now.