While I am far from the most devout linux supporter, this article is a simple attempt to propagate the viral-gpl myth.
There are many areas to attack linux on: desktop inconsistancy, lack of UI standerds, an uncompromisingly hard learning curve, however the legal basis for its existance is not one of them.
The idea that an organisation is morally wrong for taking legal action over a breach of contract is completely inane. What will we see next on forbes? "The Police: If you commit a crime they will arrest you! The nerve of this armed group...".
There are many areas to attack linux on: desktop inconsistancy, lack of UI standerds, an uncompromisingly hard learning curve, however the legal basis for its existance is not one of them.
The idea that an organisation is morally wrong for taking legal action over a breach of contract is completely inane. What will we see next on forbes? "The Police: If you commit a crime they will arrest you! The nerve of this armed group...".