You must be joking. Have you ever written a large application in CF? Talk about unmaintainable and undocumentable. CF is nice for simple one-off sites, but we've found it absolutely terrible for large-scale sites to which the customer wants constant functional additions. In fact, we're currently in the process of moving from CF 5 to perl, and the switch to an environment thats both a true language and object-oriented has been wonderful,in terms of modularity and reusability.
Slashdot Mirror
This was probably due to a poor understanding by the authors of XUL.
How ridiculous. Why should the authors have to understand XUL to comment on the usability of the user interface?
You must be joking. Have you ever written a large application in CF? Talk about unmaintainable and undocumentable. CF is nice for simple one-off sites, but we've found it absolutely terrible for large-scale sites to which the customer wants constant functional additions. In fact, we're currently in the process of moving from CF 5 to perl, and the switch to an environment thats both a true language and object-oriented has been wonderful ,in terms of modularity and reusability.