So who is worse for the Linux community SCO or Slashdot?
At a time when SCO and Microsoft are trying to show that the GPL is bad for business, slashdot users keep giving them more proof.
Linksys is giving an effort to comply. Publicly attacking them instead of going through approprate channels at Linksys accomplishes nothing.
Oh, and by the way children, when communicating with a large corporation, don't start your message with "Screw you guys, we're going to sue you!" That won't even make it past the first secretary.
So who is worse for the Linux community SCO or Slashdot?
At a time when SCO and Microsoft are trying to show that the GPL is bad for business, slashdot users keep giving them more proof.
Linksys is giving an effort to comply. Publicly attacking them instead of going through approprate channels at Linksys accomplishes nothing.
Oh, and by the way children, when communicating with a large corporation, don't start your message with "Screw you guys, we're going to sue you!" That won't even make it past the first secretary.