Despite nummerous claims here, the intent of the article on indymedia was to illustrate the stupidity of the court against xs4all. In fact, there was not even a mention of the actual titles of the articles.
Now how about the intent of the deutsche bahn: they managed to get the articles slashdotted, and try to get a volunteer organisation pay them for doing that.
That's not like hiding information from terrorists. That's not something we have judges for.
Slashdot Mirror
Despite nummerous claims here, the intent of the article on indymedia was to illustrate the stupidity of the court against xs4all. In fact, there was not even a mention of the actual titles of the articles.
Now how about the intent of the deutsche bahn: they managed to get the articles slashdotted, and try to get a volunteer organisation pay them for doing that.
That's not like hiding information from terrorists. That's not something we have judges for.
(and yes, I'm Dutch)