It is not just you, but this whole thread is full of clueless people.
From the Internet Archive Faq:
By placing a simple robots.txt file on your Web server, you can exclude your site from being crawled as well as exclude any historical pages from the Wayback Machine.
Q: Do you agree with Dr. Wallace that politicians never seem to give a straight answer to a question?
A: I have heard that opinion, but I would like to know more before I form my own.
Re:The only thing needed to destroy windows....
on
Take a Mac User to Lunch
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
Mac could be the OS Monopoly if it only started to port its stuff to the PC Platforms.
Apple will not port Mac OS X to non-Apple hardware. There are two obvious reasons:
Apple makes money selling hardware, not operating systems. Enabling people to run OS X on hardware not made by Apple will bankrupt Apple.
Mac OS X is so easy to install and reliable because it needs only to support a limited set of hardware parts.
But then again, why should one system have a monopoly? Some five years ago we had to choose between three (groups of) operating systems that were seriously flawed:
Windows was unreliable and had an inferior command line.
MacOS was unreliable and did not have a command line at all.
Unix had an ugly user interface and could only be used by nerds.
Nowadays we can choose between three pretty good operatings systems: Windows + Cygwin, MacOS X, Linux + KDE or GNOME. If we are lucky enough to maintain this healthy competition, perhaps some day there will be a Linux system my mother can use and a Windows system that I want to use (but I'll probably still use Mac OS X).
Slashdot Mirror
It is not just you, but this whole thread is full of clueless people. From the Internet Archive Faq: By placing a simple robots.txt file on your Web server, you can exclude your site from being crawled as well as exclude any historical pages from the Wayback Machine.
Obl. bash.org quote:
<Kupo> man
<Kupo> Firefox can fuck itself
<DarknessTear> It can? So THAT's what the Firefox logo is doing.
From alicebot.org (almost ./-ed):
Q: Do you agree with Dr. Wallace that politicians never seem to give a straight answer to a question?
A: I have heard that opinion, but I would like to know more before I form my own.
Mac could be the OS Monopoly if it only started to port its stuff to the PC Platforms.
Apple will not port Mac OS X to non-Apple hardware. There are two obvious reasons:
But then again, why should one system have a monopoly? Some five years ago we had to choose between three (groups of) operating systems that were seriously flawed:
Nowadays we can choose between three pretty good operatings systems: Windows + Cygwin, MacOS X, Linux + KDE or GNOME. If we are lucky enough to maintain this healthy competition, perhaps some day there will be a Linux system my mother can use and a Windows system that I want to use (but I'll probably still use Mac OS X).