You are missing the point I made. Your hard drive isnt being searched if you are on a p2p network. Its blatant and clear as day that you are sharing the file. Dont get me wrong. I think this is bullsh*t as well. But noone has to search your house if you are distributing drugs on your front porch. (Hate to go back to the drug reference but its the first analogy that comes to mind)
The rest of the world uses the Death Penalty just a little more "freely" than the US.
I.E.
Sleep with Bush's daughter. Get SS protection.
Sleep with "Fill in Blank" Dictator. Public Execution after they castrate your little brother.
Im sorry to say. But if you are sharing music. Its kind of like having a trunk full of drugs, but the body of your car is made of glass. Noone is really searching for the drugs. They can see it plain as day.
I disagree with the law like the rest of you but "Search and Seizure" is a bad way to argue against this law.
Within our company we have done extensive testing on this. We found that if UDP packets are sent consecutively under 5ms intervals the loss is approximatley 3-5% (if this is the only network traffic!). If you decrease the interval, you will notice a logarithmic increase in packet loss.
President Skroob: Why didn't somebody tell me my ass was so big?
You are missing the point I made. Your hard drive isnt being searched if you are on a p2p network. Its blatant and clear as day that you are sharing the file.
Dont get me wrong. I think this is bullsh*t as well. But noone has to search your house if you are distributing drugs on your front porch. (Hate to go back to the drug reference but its the first analogy that comes to mind)
I was actually referring to cops. I know the whole deal is scary. No matter how you look at it.
The rest of the world uses the Death Penalty just a little more "freely" than the US. I.E. Sleep with Bush's daughter. Get SS protection. Sleep with "Fill in Blank" Dictator. Public Execution after they castrate your little brother.
Im sorry to say. But if you are sharing music. Its kind of like having a trunk full of drugs, but the body of your car is made of glass. Noone is really searching for the drugs. They can see it plain as day. I disagree with the law like the rest of you but "Search and Seizure" is a bad way to argue against this law.
Within our company we have done extensive testing on this. We found that if UDP packets are sent consecutively under 5ms intervals the loss is approximatley 3-5% (if this is the only network traffic!). If you decrease the interval, you will notice a logarithmic increase in packet loss.