This is shifting my understanding of "conspiracy".
I'm not second-guessing whether there was a conspiracy here, but a single interaction seems like weak proof if so. Does this translate into other areas where a single act entwines you in the whole undertaking?
This is shifting my understanding of "conspiracy". I'm not second-guessing whether there was a conspiracy here, but a single interaction seems like weak proof if so. Does this translate into other areas where a single act entwines you in the whole undertaking?