I see the only thing you are CAPABLE OF DOING is FLAMING things You Know about in a flash not FULLY reading your documents
LET's refer to the beginning of the post you "overly knowledgeable idiot"
>.worked with macs "at a point in my career" that would constru NOT on a evolving basis if the only thing you can attack "you simpleton with your big brained mac" is 5 points I found using the Machine & it's pathetic OS versions for a period of but not exceeding 22 months of coninual use over 15 years between systems 6.02~9.1 & beta 10X+ of which if you look deep enough "your blithering moron enablers are used! try to use a Imac 9x disk to boot a g4... It won't..! Why MIGHT THAT BE?????? open it up and smell the frigin ENABELER you bonehead" I would not recommend going to battle with toothpicks when I ve got a whole list of BMUG bugs and issues [ not to mention years of knowledge over you] info from when I almost went down the path. The 5 points I was generalizing if you want a toe to toe on its failure ILL give it starting with ATM and workng my way back need I get into the IP stack issues... However you are correct about changes in the OSX "I checked up on the problems I was seeing some of them have been addressed **especially the GUI issue**", BUT thier implemnetiation of GIGABIT IS FLAWED STILL!!! {does not properly interface with NAS or STD TCP implementations and will not respond to full stream requests) "oh and smarty pants come back with proof since I can name 2 companys "both video editing houses, CHARLEX being one of them" in New York which kept me up debugging my sh!t to find apple has not fixed thier code AND THERE IS NO ROADMAP TO FIX IT SINCE IT DOESNT MAKE FULL BANDWITH TRANSFERS.. "may be because the idiots decided to go with copper gig and strip protocols to save $$$$ and limit distance {thats is apples (think DIFFRENT)in action}" its only saving throw is the spotcow crew decided to leave thier little hitler shell to join society "going with an unix variant "opensource" they didnt have time to destroy..yet." someone must have cut down the drug use to realize the rest of the world exists outside thier funked existence.
and review to your 5 points
1. Enablers are used if they are not tell me why I cannot get a system disk from one mac say a G4 IMAC and use it to boot a G4 Tower?
they are the same chipset? "correct" if so why does it not allow you to boot or install off theat cd? dont say software protection cuz the boot files are keyed that is too hokey and answer, but if you were to saye the proper boot files were not present that would be correct.."try this some time " -wipe out the water behind the ears first-... *---- the forementioned sounds like enablers to me
2. oh and the CLI is what people refer to as the first floor "or was when I got into this field back in the early 80's and it was necessary to allow a reconcile to repair issues like NETWORK FAILURE "why would unix use CLI to set up interfaces.."and still does mind you" if a possible gui failure could take down the whole system? maybe because by having a CLI they can REPAIR the problem by DROPING the GUI and BRINGING it back UP when the problem is fixed WO dropping the SERVICE "I know this is a tough concept for you mac user, but you may need to get the water from behind the ears to hear it, also head out of the toilet would help"
3. FORCE QUIT only makes macs UNSTABLE thus it doesnt work EOL. try to FORCE QUIT ADOBE-ATM and then try to use your network with flexi sign pro running, guess what you simpletion it does not net-work until when? guess you smart idiot.... unitl it is rebooted thats when NOTE even with code warrior one good dump "duiring compile" your access to the CVS and/or network in gerneal is FLUBBED ToTaLy.
4. I may not be a extension master, but I never noticed anything beyond setting up different extension sets to correct problems why dont you enlighten us unix and pc idiots since you are so smart and layout the PROPER proceedure STEP BY STEP --if there is a better way show me
5. I admint Ianm incorrect on this issue was fixed my mistake in posing w/o looking.
As far a my professional knowledge I never proclamed to be a mac lover EVER so why would I delve past the Blaring problems to focus on it best to dwele on open things which dont require buying 24 volumes from steve jobs&co. to open up and develop for a stolen OS which was taken from XEROX in the late 70's rebutt that "note it was concieved by XEROX in 1968" smack that as far as the blow that windows was a steal from apple my response would be "ever look at OS2?" that is where windows originated from EOL
oh and during the next reply try to not be such a coward "chicken Sh!T" and login WIMP tech
I put my balls on the table.... your turn
To start I use bsd,linux,solaris,win32 and at some bad time in my career was forced into supporting the mac "that now is alot mose $$$ if I need to think or touch one" the following is my rant
This article posted on slashdot is very pointed using stupid half witted information collected by mass market sites most TRUE computer Individuals AVOID like anthrax coated envelopes these so called surveys are targeted "to be nice" at people gullible enough to answer them. Do you know there are surveys that show people like surveys? {Think about that before firing back... (Think how stupid you must be the even consider answering a survey like that or how much thought would be given)} How smart are people who answer erroneous questions? Are they SMARTER than those who Avoid them? If your numbers are based on trivial Surveys produced by sites, which promote questions 90% of true computer users, do not even bother with or those damn surveys to judge your numbers then they are Smarter at getting USED and FEEDING the MASS Market/media. A Little history here: Apple made decent gear back in the day "1978 to be exact" but flubbed when splitting their line in 1984; this may have been Way before your time so I can't hold the lack of intelligence in this matter against you even with a college background and all. If you are saying that the normal person compared to the people who make the operating systems and programs which make things more usable for the technically challenged ergo people who don't know what CLI means or understand editors "text based" are smarter than those who build the world or the tangible existence you users consider the world then I am stupid and realize you are using my tools. (You "smart idiot")
Lastly I may not have a great/stupid college degree, Me, a lowly idiot clearing 120k annually "for my ability to work outside the box all my college educated underlings never do since they were graded on how well they could stay in the box that is why I make 3X what they make and why they report to me" W/O any university paperwork just word of mouth from one corporation to another EMC, IBM, Bluearc, and Network appliance just to name a few. So when you decide to share information realize that not all users "or the majority you are flag waiving about" who are smart or Smarter use/used Mac's. Most hardware and software people "true computer people" use PC's that is why there is more PC software and LESS MAC software chew on that. Moreover, So if MAC users are smarter then tell me why they lock themselves into 1 vendor & 1 operating system ALL of which is made by 1 company which has proven over the past 18 years they have 0 loyalty to continuing customers... how smart is that?
Facts to ponder on
1. Mac os upgrades, you are REQUIRED to purchase ALL your software again due to Compatibility ISSUES "this is because of switches in the ENABLER which bootstraps the system folder and loads extensions" "trust me ive had to work with it" 2. System has no CLI to use for running a command if there is a failure "therin using linux core in OSX -- not functioning proplerly anyway" 3. Force quit is a (n) attempt at a "break key" which functions partly and is unreliable at best 4. No stepped loading "or logged I may add" you either have to turn off ALL extensions or CONTINUALLY load the system enableing/disableing 1 extension at a time 5. With all its processing power it still has a slower interface explain please why a faster lower instruction set os is slower than a cisc os running on cisc chips? "Maybe because it is adjustable and capable of being mutated/streamlined" "referencing linux and win32"
I am open to rebuttal on the discussion I know that the computer community or the tech field is not the only judge of knowledge, but to say that only smarter people use Macs is like saying only smart people use butterfly stiches and therefore are smarter than the other people. That would Imply most doctors are idiots this is just the other side of the coin. If you have made it to this I appreciate your time and wish you the best in any and all endeavours
Network Attached Storage Architect/Developer "SAN is the way of the past NAS is the future of data warehousing"
Slashdot Mirror
I see the only thing you are CAPABLE OF DOING is FLAMING things You Know about in a flash not FULLY reading your documents LET's refer to the beginning of the post you "overly knowledgeable idiot" >.worked with macs "at a point in my career" that would constru NOT on a evolving basis if the only thing you can attack "you simpleton with your big brained mac" is 5 points I found using the Machine & it's pathetic OS versions for a period of but not exceeding 22 months of coninual use over 15 years between systems 6.02~9.1 & beta 10X+ of which if you look deep enough "your blithering moron enablers are used! try to use a Imac 9x disk to boot a g4... It won't..! Why MIGHT THAT BE?????? open it up and smell the frigin ENABELER you bonehead" I would not recommend going to battle with toothpicks when I ve got a whole list of BMUG bugs and issues [ not to mention years of knowledge over you] info from when I almost went down the path. The 5 points I was generalizing if you want a toe to toe on its failure ILL give it starting with ATM and workng my way back need I get into the IP stack issues... However you are correct about changes in the OSX "I checked up on the problems I was seeing some of them have been addressed **especially the GUI issue**", BUT thier implemnetiation of GIGABIT IS FLAWED STILL!!! {does not properly interface with NAS or STD TCP implementations and will not respond to full stream requests) "oh and smarty pants come back with proof since I can name 2 companys "both video editing houses, CHARLEX being one of them" in New York which kept me up debugging my sh!t to find apple has not fixed thier code AND THERE IS NO ROADMAP TO FIX IT SINCE IT DOESNT MAKE FULL BANDWITH TRANSFERS.. "may be because the idiots decided to go with copper gig and strip protocols to save $$$$ and limit distance {thats is apples (think DIFFRENT)in action}" its only saving throw is the spotcow crew decided to leave thier little hitler shell to join society "going with an unix variant "opensource" they didnt have time to destroy..yet." someone must have cut down the drug use to realize the rest of the world exists outside thier funked existence. and review to your 5 points 1. Enablers are used if they are not tell me why I cannot get a system disk from one mac say a G4 IMAC and use it to boot a G4 Tower? they are the same chipset? "correct" if so why does it not allow you to boot or install off theat cd? dont say software protection cuz the boot files are keyed that is too hokey and answer, but if you were to saye the proper boot files were not present that would be correct .."try this some time " -wipe out the water behind the ears first- ... *---- the forementioned sounds like enablers to me
2. oh and the CLI is what people refer to as the first floor "or was when I got into this field back in the early 80's and it was necessary to allow a reconcile to repair issues like NETWORK FAILURE "why would unix use CLI to set up interfaces .."and still does mind you" if a possible gui failure could take down the whole system? maybe because by having a CLI they can REPAIR the problem by DROPING the GUI and BRINGING it back UP when the problem is fixed WO dropping the SERVICE "I know this is a tough concept for you mac user, but you may need to get the water from behind the ears to hear it, also head out of the toilet would help"
3. FORCE QUIT only makes macs UNSTABLE thus it doesnt work EOL. try to FORCE QUIT ADOBE-ATM and then try to use your network with flexi sign pro running, guess what you simpletion it does not net-work until when? guess you smart idiot .... unitl it is rebooted thats when NOTE even with code warrior one good dump "duiring compile" your access to the CVS and/or network in gerneal is FLUBBED ToTaLy.
4. I may not be a extension master, but I never noticed anything beyond setting up different extension sets to correct problems why dont you enlighten us unix and pc idiots since you are so smart and layout the PROPER proceedure STEP BY STEP --if there is a better way show me
5. I admint Ianm incorrect on this issue was fixed my mistake in posing w/o looking.
As far a my professional knowledge I never proclamed to be a mac lover EVER so why would I delve past the Blaring problems to focus on it best to dwele on open things which dont require buying 24 volumes from steve jobs&co. to open up and develop for a stolen OS which was taken from XEROX in the late 70's rebutt that "note it was concieved by XEROX in 1968" smack that as far as the blow that windows was a steal from apple my response would be "ever look at OS2?" that is where windows originated from EOL
oh and during the next reply try to not be such a coward "chicken Sh!T" and login WIMP tech
I put my balls on the table.... your turn
To start I use bsd,linux,solaris,win32 and at some bad time in my career was forced into supporting the mac "that now is alot mose $$$ if I need to think or touch one" the following is my rant
This article posted on slashdot is very pointed using stupid half witted information collected by mass market sites most TRUE computer Individuals AVOID like anthrax coated envelopes these so called surveys are targeted "to be nice" at people gullible enough to answer them. Do you know there are surveys that show people like surveys? {Think about that before firing back... (Think how stupid you must be the even consider answering a survey like that or how much thought would be given)}
How smart are people who answer erroneous questions? Are they SMARTER than those who Avoid them? If your numbers are based on trivial Surveys produced by sites, which promote questions 90% of true computer users, do not even bother with or those damn surveys to judge your numbers then they are Smarter at getting USED and FEEDING the MASS Market/media.
A Little history here:
Apple made decent gear back in the day "1978 to be exact" but flubbed when splitting their line in 1984; this may have been Way before your time so I can't hold the lack of intelligence in this matter against you even with a college background and all.
If you are saying that the normal person compared to the people who make the operating systems and programs which make things more usable for the technically challenged ergo people who don't know what CLI means or understand editors "text based" are smarter than those who build the world or the tangible existence you users consider the world then I am stupid and realize you are using my tools. (You "smart idiot")
Lastly I may not have a great/stupid college degree, Me, a lowly idiot clearing 120k annually "for my ability to work outside the box all my college educated underlings never do since they were graded on how well they could stay in the box that is why I make 3X what they make and why they report to me" W/O any university paperwork just word of mouth from one corporation to another EMC, IBM, Bluearc, and Network appliance just to name a few. So when you decide to share information realize that not all users "or the majority you are flag waiving about" who are smart or Smarter use/used Mac's.
Most hardware and software people "true computer people" use PC's that is why there is more PC software and LESS MAC software chew on that.
Moreover, So if MAC users are smarter then tell me why they lock themselves into 1 vendor & 1 operating system ALL of which is made by 1 company which has proven over the past 18 years they have 0 loyalty to continuing customers... how smart is that?
Facts to ponder on
1. Mac os upgrades, you are REQUIRED to purchase ALL your software again due to Compatibility ISSUES "this is because of switches in the ENABLER which bootstraps the system folder and loads extensions" "trust me ive had to work with it"
2. System has no CLI to use for running a command if there is a failure "therin using linux core in OSX -- not functioning proplerly anyway"
3. Force quit is a (n) attempt at a "break key" which functions partly and is unreliable at best
4. No stepped loading "or logged I may add" you either have to turn off ALL extensions or CONTINUALLY load the system enableing/disableing 1 extension at a time
5. With all its processing power it still has a slower interface explain please why a faster lower instruction set os is slower than a cisc os running on cisc chips? "Maybe because it is adjustable and capable of being mutated/streamlined" "referencing linux and win32"
I am open to rebuttal on the discussion I know that the computer community or the tech field is not the only judge of knowledge, but to say that only smarter people use Macs is like saying only smart people use butterfly stiches and therefore are smarter than the other people. That would Imply most doctors are idiots this is just the other side of the coin. If you have made it to this I appreciate your time and wish you the best in any and all endeavours
Network Attached Storage
Architect/Developer
"SAN is the way of the past NAS is the future of data warehousing"