Slashdot Mirror


User: noselasd

noselasd's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
528
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 528

  1. Re:D converts code to C on C, Objective-C, C++... D! Future Or failure? · · Score: 1

    You are indeed right :-/
    It only uses gcc for linking..

  2. Re:Hmmm.... on C, Objective-C, C++... D! Future Or failure? · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >another language that's a bit like C++?
    Yes. How many do we have that's like C++ ?
    None. We have Java,C#,Python and similar things.
    BUT, they're interpreted or JIT'ed languages.
    But really none(save perhaps objective-c) in the
    same league as C and C++.

  3. Re:Rant time!! on XOrg Foundation Opens Membership and Elections · · Score: 4, Informative

    >2: Why does the ENTIRE app need to redraw itself (using huge amounts of
    >network bandwidth) every time I obscure it with a window or hop to
    >another virtual desktop??? The damned thing is already wasting traffic
    >updating when I'm not even lookin g at it, why does it need to redraw
    >AGAIN when I view the window again???? Now onto my final gripe for
    >right now.
    Toolkit problem. Don't blame that on X.

    >Gripe 3: If X is such a truly network independent application why the
    >hell can't I simply redirect the output of an already running process
    >to any X-term???
    Cause ther's a lot of state residing on the X server about every
    application/Xwindow. And there is no current way of transferring
    that state to another X server.

  4. D converts code to C on C, Objective-C, C++... D! Future Or failure? · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just fyi, D is really a frontend. It generates C code, which is then
    compiled with your ordininary gcc. Nice imho so you get great speed,
    and don't have to write a compiler again ;)

  5. Re:full C compatability? on C, Objective-C, C++... D! Future Or failure? · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No. Its a very nice feature.
    Just about anything you need, there's a C library for it.
    Think nice things like opengl,pam,openssl,GUI librairies, database
    libraries, and heaps more.
    Having access to those is very nice, and you don't have to wait anyone
    to port those to a new language(which probably won't happen anyway.)
    I'd imagine how far C++ had gotten if it couldn't use C libraries..

  6. Re:Sure would be nice on First Person Shooter - Under 100KBs of Code · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No.
    It pretty much depends on what the code does as well. If you have a
    really cool way of computing the normals of thousands of polygons in 10
    lines of code, that might be _alot_ slower than a great algorithm doing it in 100 lines.
    By your argument, the code in the story should run 100'ds of times faster than any of the recent commercial FPS games..

  7. space.com on Hubble Photo of Sedna Suprises Astronomers · · Score: 4, Informative

    Story also here
    Small info:
    * Sedna is about three-fourths the size of Pluto.
    * It takes 10,000 years to orbit the Sun.
    * Sedna spins on its axis once every 20 Earth-days.

  8. Re:A similar question: edit/compile/run over ADSL on Distributed Filesystem for Disconnected Operation? · · Score: 2, Informative

    Use version control ?
    Edit at your local site, have a (subversion/cvs)server at the office.

  9. Re:Picture of developer on Funding An Individual BSD Developer · · Score: 1

    Hmm, honest question, why a troll mod ? the link points to http://people.freebsd.org/~phk/
    which actually IS poul henning kamp's homepage..

  10. Re:Picture of developer on Funding An Individual BSD Developer · · Score: 3, Informative

    Link is broken. A real picture is here.

  11. Jak and Daxter ? on Patience, Grasshopper - On Long Load Times For Games · · Score: 5, Informative

    Have people here played Jak'n' Daxter (or Jak II) on the PS2 ?
    It features an enormous world, with many levels. And no loading time
    between them. Roaming around the world, and among diffrent levels etc. is totally smooth.
    Developers got a thing or two to learn from it.

  12. Re:This is great! on Hollywood's Rising Fascination With Videogames · · Score: 0

    No we won't. We'll get crappy games from EA Games licensing famous titles, just like ïn the past.

  13. Re:I am for these patents on Demonstration Against Software Patents in Europe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >Patents are good and they have a reason. It protects personal IP and guarantees that other companies gonna pay licenses for using these patents.
    This is good and desirable for what reason ?

  14. Re:They mean "escape" as in "growing wild" on Scotts Testing Genetically Modified Grass · · Score: 1, Funny

    The ones that glow in the dark ?

  15. Re:This is sick. on Scotts Testing Genetically Modified Grass · · Score: 1

    I'll agree on beeing very very careful to put it out in the wild.
    But ban it ? Nope. The benefits can be huge. And unless recearch is
    done, we will never know anything about the effects.

    Anyway, most of us already eat genetically modified wheat, wear
    clothes from modified cotton plants and lots of other stuff.

    Mankind have done genetically modifications for 1000's of years
    already(look at all the dog/cat races, orange trees that produces big
    and juicy oranges, etc.).
    Just that now we can control it a lot better to our benefit.
    Nice imho, no a very big deal if one takes the needed precausions.

  16. Re:To my understanding... on The State of OpenGL · · Score: 1

    Uhm,, because the D3D API plainly sucks ?
    Really. There are many reasons, personal preference,
    more OpenGL experience. Favor C over C++ etc.

    The real alternative is SDL for portability, handling input, windowing and other small things, OpenGL(ofcourse) for the grahics, and OpenAL for sound.

  17. Re:Java on top of OpenGL is happening... on The State of OpenGL · · Score: 1

    Hold it..
    Faster ? Yes, if one have installed the OpenGL drivers for the specific cards you
    have. Many cards (on Linux) doesn't have hw accelerated drivers, and we are stuck with Mesa.
    Which means software rendering.
    Which means slow as hell.

  18. Re:Cool on NetBSD Quarterly Status Report · · Score: 1

    >Subject: Announcing the New NetBSD logo
    >To: None
    >From: Hubert Feyrer
    >List: netbsd-advocacy
    >Date: 04/01/2004 00:15:39

    Lets take a look at the Date header again ;)

  19. But I just read.. on Local Area Security Linux LiveCD · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hmm.. pondering about how this releates to this

  20. Re:Cool on NetBSD Quarterly Status Report · · Score: 1

    You defintly should start fidling with NetBSD as well :-)
    Its much cleaner, and more stable than any other OS's I've tried.

  21. Re:Viruses spread by stupidity not OS'es. on Linux in Canada · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't see that as a much lesser chance. My mail is filled with
    virus mails, wether they come from windows or linux(root or non-root) users doesn't make much diffrence.

  22. Re:Amiga Disks on The New Linux Speed Trick · · Score: 1

    Hmm, sounds exactly like the early 2.4 kernels.
    Did MS borrow some MM code here perhaps ? ;)

  23. Re:Community? on Open Source PS2 Site Celebrates 3rd Anniversary · · Score: 1

    Since Sony have the uber all control over publishing(only legal way
    you can make a CD/DVD "boot" on PS2 is for Sony to produce it) I have
    a hard time seeing the ps2dev.org community do that.
    Lets not also forget that Sony has their own community
    with the ps2 linux kit.

  24. Re:Anyone have more information? on Open Source PS2 Site Celebrates 3rd Anniversary · · Score: 3, Informative

    Some info at http://ps2dev.org/kb.x?T=691
    Basically, you need a modchip, or use the PSO Exploit, or
    get a memory card with some special files on it.

    You have to realize this is made by "l337" people who
    have noe clue whatsoever on how to write docs.

  25. Re:Red Hat's Going on on Red Hat Recap · · Score: 2, Informative

    On the other hand, Red Hat makes a damn fine stable product. Well tested
    and with lots of enterprise features.
    You can pay for it and get support,(and not to mention "support" redhat).
    Or you can get it for free - www.whiteboxlinux.org