What the research does do is to lend credence to the argument that insects and birds could have evolved, rather than having been 'designed' by some sort of a God.
And how drunk were you when you wrote this post? The robot was designed, wasn't it? By human hands [read: higher intellignece, "God" to the robot], yes? This actually lends credence to the fact that incects and birds were created and designed by God. This proves absolutly nothing for evolutionary arguments, rather it hinders the arguments because this robot required the design of a higher being, Mankind! Geesh, some people should not be allowed to post when they are drunk.
Slashdot Mirror
What the research does do is to lend credence to the argument that insects and birds could have evolved, rather than having been 'designed' by some sort of a God.
And how drunk were you when you wrote this post? The robot was designed, wasn't it? By human hands [read: higher intellignece, "God" to the robot], yes? This actually lends credence to the fact that incects and birds were created and designed by God. This proves absolutly nothing for evolutionary arguments, rather it hinders the arguments because this robot required the design of a higher being, Mankind! Geesh, some people should not be allowed to post when they are drunk.