1. this device must not cause any harmful interference 2. this device must accept any interference even if it causes undesirable operation.
This applies to wireless lan products as well. So what if that interference causes some corporation's wireless device to use bandwidth and transmit potentially useful information to the source of such interference (me with my handy dandy wireless enabled laptop)
Damn, ripped off with the whole -9 GMT of Alaska.
Makes sense that Russians visible from Wasilla were embracing democracy yesterday.
Not to be too blunt, But shouldn't a CNN report equal some kind of study, which also is overblown and innaccurate.
Doesn't part 15 of the FCC rules state that
1. this device must not cause any harmful interference
2. this device must accept any interference even if it causes undesirable operation.
This applies to wireless lan products as well. So what if that interference causes some corporation's wireless device to use bandwidth and transmit potentially useful information to the source of such interference (me with my handy dandy wireless enabled laptop)