No that's not what I mean, I would think the opposite, it should be bundled with the OS and considered a critical component of the OS, not something to be charged for. This might bring OS publishers to begin thinking that AV protection is a critical part of an OS.
I am also not only talking security flaws, but actual threats that can not be prevented by a patch to the OS, such as unsafe executable attachments.
Although it might put a few companies out of business, all of the people angry with Microsoft's lack of security would finally get what they have asked for.
I can't stomach the argument that MS shouldn't bundle AV software with their OS. Why the heck not??? IMHO, every OS would benefit substantially from changing the perception of antivirus protection from a software package, to an integrated part of any respectable OS. Funny, we allow OS developers to build many things in except for features which already exist as stand-alone apps.
I have had a similar problem i made a folder called personal, one called general workmail one called Server Issues, one for each software product I work on etc. Then I got emails about how a software product had problems interfacing with a server. Does this go in Server Issues or under the software product? It would be nice if you could make outlook links in one folder. I suppose you could save a copy of the email to each folder?
I am very suprised a city the size of seattle has taken that long to get proper rapid transit. Look to your north to vancouver and have a look at a system that has been in place since 1986. it is about time for seattle.
just curious, why wouldnt you use a higher speed system than a monorail (maybe something similar to the skytrain in vancouver?)
better than nothing though
Slashdot Mirror
No that's not what I mean, I would think the opposite, it should be bundled with the OS and considered a critical component of the OS, not something to be charged for. This might bring OS publishers to begin thinking that AV protection is a critical part of an OS. I am also not only talking security flaws, but actual threats that can not be prevented by a patch to the OS, such as unsafe executable attachments. Although it might put a few companies out of business, all of the people angry with Microsoft's lack of security would finally get what they have asked for.
I can't stomach the argument that MS shouldn't bundle AV software with their OS. Why the heck not??? IMHO, every OS would benefit substantially from changing the perception of antivirus protection from a software package, to an integrated part of any respectable OS. Funny, we allow OS developers to build many things in except for features which already exist as stand-alone apps.
I have had a similar problem
i made a folder called personal, one called general workmail one called Server Issues, one for each software product I work on etc. Then I got emails about how a software product had problems interfacing with a server. Does this go in Server Issues or under the software product? It would be nice if you could make outlook links in one folder. I suppose you could save a copy of the email to each folder?
I am very suprised a city the size of seattle has taken that long to get proper rapid transit. Look to your north to vancouver and have a look at a system that has been in place since 1986. it is about time for seattle. just curious, why wouldnt you use a higher speed system than a monorail (maybe something similar to the skytrain in vancouver?) better than nothing though