The book I recommended answers all of your arguments. The reason that there are not fossils from all "missing links" is because we have not searched everywhere, and because fossilization is very rare.
I could quote "The Blind Watchmaker" to disprove every one of your arguments you just made against evolution, but that would take the fun out of you reading it, wouldn't it?
Haha, lost my train of thought there, last sentence is supposed to say "Is it not hypocritical to believe in one theory that has no evidence while calling another theory that is backed up by fossil records, Darwin's actual experiments, other notable scientific experiments and countless other pieces of evidence unbelievable?
Read "The Blind Watchmaker" By Richard Dawkins, if you still don't understand how evolution could possibly have happened.
I'd like to see Dr. Hovind's scientific evidence that there even IS a God. Is it not hypocritical to believe in one theory that has no evidence while calling another theory that is backed up by fossil records, Darwin's actual experiments, other notable scientific experiments and countless other pieces of evidence?
The book I recommended answers all of your arguments. The reason that there are not fossils from all "missing links" is because we have not searched everywhere, and because fossilization is very rare. I could quote "The Blind Watchmaker" to disprove every one of your arguments you just made against evolution, but that would take the fun out of you reading it, wouldn't it?
Haha, lost my train of thought there, last sentence is supposed to say "Is it not hypocritical to believe in one theory that has no evidence while calling another theory that is backed up by fossil records, Darwin's actual experiments, other notable scientific experiments and countless other pieces of evidence unbelievable?
Read "The Blind Watchmaker" By Richard Dawkins, if you still don't understand how evolution could possibly have happened. I'd like to see Dr. Hovind's scientific evidence that there even IS a God. Is it not hypocritical to believe in one theory that has no evidence while calling another theory that is backed up by fossil records, Darwin's actual experiments, other notable scientific experiments and countless other pieces of evidence?