Unfortunately, the strong believe in a sentient creator -- it's not easy knowing there is a force ultimately stronger than you. The weak choose to ignore the observables -- order and purpose denote design, not random mutation. The fear of a sentient creator stems from the desire to not be accountable for actions, beliefs and choices. I do believe in myself, and in the fact that everything was created with a purpose. My religion comes from my belief in a creator, not the other way around.
I'm not sure what evolutionary path you are observing, since even the most learned scientists can't agree on a evolutionary path for birds. There may be consensus in one camp, but another equally qualified camp disagrees. The gaps in the fossil record cannot responsibly be filled by wishing and guessing.
Evolution? That's the rubbish.
They built the optimized wings for the computer, they gave it the "muscular" control and the "neural" connections to command them, then they think it's news when it "flies"?
The order, structure and design of the universe screams for the existence of a sentient creator that planned and DESIGNED its inhabitants and environment. Birds were created with optimized wings, muscular control and neural ability. They fly because they were designed to fly.
Think rationally -- how "useful" would a primitive wing that can't produce lift, can't grasp objects and can't forage for food have been for the species to have considered it a "beneficial mutation" to continue via natural selection?
Slashdot Mirror
Unfortunately, the strong believe in a sentient creator -- it's not easy knowing there is a force ultimately stronger than you. The weak choose to ignore the observables -- order and purpose denote design, not random mutation. The fear of a sentient creator stems from the desire to not be accountable for actions, beliefs and choices. I do believe in myself, and in the fact that everything was created with a purpose. My religion comes from my belief in a creator, not the other way around.
I'm not sure what evolutionary path you are observing, since even the most learned scientists can't agree on a evolutionary path for birds. There may be consensus in one camp, but another equally qualified camp disagrees. The gaps in the fossil record cannot responsibly be filled by wishing and guessing.
Evolution? That's the rubbish. They built the optimized wings for the computer, they gave it the "muscular" control and the "neural" connections to command them, then they think it's news when it "flies"? The order, structure and design of the universe screams for the existence of a sentient creator that planned and DESIGNED its inhabitants and environment. Birds were created with optimized wings, muscular control and neural ability. They fly because they were designed to fly. Think rationally -- how "useful" would a primitive wing that can't produce lift, can't grasp objects and can't forage for food have been for the species to have considered it a "beneficial mutation" to continue via natural selection?