Like most around here I do not reply to news articles often, however the passion of Mr Pascal really has forced me to.
Sadly Mr Pascal really does not understand how the medium of/. really works. Before being linked to by/. Mr Pascal doesn't realize that for most of the IT population he was like the rest of us, and probably will end up like that again.. Nobody of importance except in our own minds. As well given the traffic of/. we all realize that he also only received a minor interest compared to many many other posts which received a huge amount of response compared to the piddly 443 replies.
What is worse is that while he preaches his background living through harder times than the rest of us, and relying on his univeristy training making him smarter than the rest of us. He writes or claims to write works of constructive critisim and yet cannot respond to a critique of his work other than paultry name calling (paraphrase)'your all idiots!!'
It is easy as I've shown to critise someone/something, it is difficult to provide suggestions of improvement. May I suggest that before you start name calling you consider how your overly defensive behavior has tarnished your name./. writes what it writes, virtually unmoderated, no propiganda involved. If your bringing something to the table, consider yourself marginalized.
Slashdot Mirror
Like most around here I do not reply to news articles often, however the passion of Mr Pascal really has forced me to. Sadly Mr Pascal really does not understand how the medium of /. really works. Before being linked to by /. Mr Pascal doesn't realize that for most of the IT population he was like the rest of us, and probably will end up like that again.. Nobody of importance except in our own minds. As well given the traffic of /. we all realize that he also only received a minor interest compared to many many other posts which received a huge amount of response compared to the piddly 443 replies.
What is worse is that while he preaches his background living through harder times than the rest of us, and relying on his univeristy training making him smarter than the rest of us. He writes or claims to write works of constructive critisim and yet cannot respond to a critique of his work other than paultry name calling (paraphrase)'your all idiots!!'
It is easy as I've shown to critise someone/something, it is difficult to provide suggestions of improvement. May I suggest that before you start name calling you consider how your overly defensive behavior has tarnished your name. /. writes what it writes, virtually unmoderated, no propiganda involved. If your bringing something to the table, consider yourself marginalized.