Obama appointees think that Americans should be punished for living. I think differently than them, and in this case it's sufficient justification for firing them.
What's this sudden interest in "divesting himself from his business interests?" He's turning over the operation of his businesses to his family, so as to minimize conflicts of interest. Do you actually expect him to liquify his assets? There's nothing that requires the President to take a vow of poverty.
Our greatest President, George Washington, didn't sell his farm when he took office. There's no reason for any other President to act differently.
So the Democrats threatening electors is not an "extraordinary or violent movement"? The Democrats promoting riots outside Trump rallies were "extraordinary or violent movements", and the responsibility of Clinton electors should be to switch their votes to Trump.
You are mistaken. There are many restrictions on abusive photography, all of them quite reasonable. Some have been established by case law, others by legislation.
I agree with the GP, that the language of the 5th Amendment is clear and applies here, and further that regarding the Constitution as plastic and subject to interpretation leads to disaster. Justice Stephens was wrong in that both the key and the combination are protected by the Fourth and Fifth Amendments; the distinction between them is inconsequential. Judge Black is wrong because his decision violates the Fourth and Fifth Amendments.
Nobody really knows what's going to happen when SS runs out of money, but there's a good chance that SS will continue doing what it's doing now (but hiding): take the money from the general fund. If SS were suddenly cut in half, the spurt of recall elections would be dizzying.
Houses and land far enough from cities can be quite affordable. You don't need an indoor swimming pool and bowling alley; a nice house can be $150,000.
The point of having equity and precious metal investments is that to a large extent they track inflation. Of course, if there's a total economic collapse the equity investments will likely be hurt extremely badly, but in a total economic collapse everyone is screwed anyway.
The share price dropping gives the corporation the ability to buy back shares at a lower price. This improves the ability of the company to do things like go private or otherwise defend itself from troublemakers in the general public.
A well established company with ongoing profits needs stockholders like a boat needs a hole.
The only harm that such divestitures cause a company are that some employees who have been rewarded with stock options will see the value of those options fall for a few years until the divestiture fad falls off.
Remember, the ultimate reference of wealth is human effort. If an individual cancer cure gives the patient 10 extra years of life but costs 40 man-years of labor, there's a net loss involved for humanity. Under a capitalist system, that tradeoff may be made voluntarily. Under socialized medicine, those treated will be those with political pull and those believed to have most to offer the state. Choose wisely.
It only took a few years for DNA sequencing to go from being a multimillion dollar undertaking to being so routine that ornithologists use it to distinguish separate species from subspecies. I can see that individual cancer cures will require specialized breweries to make the proper cells, but a large part of that ought to be capable of automation some day.
The same CNN poll also says that Trump won among those who were male, who were older, and who were white. I.e. those less inclined to be emotional, who were more experienced, and who didn't have an axe to grind.
And who is Trump beholden to? Well, we don't know. Because he didn't release his taxes.
Complete nonsequitur.
Furthermore, if there were anything even hinting at a flaw in Trump's tax returns, the already-established-as-corrupt IRS would have "leaked" it.
Remember, Trump does business through corporations he controls. His personal tax returns could easily show nothing but salaries from dozens of corporations. Of course, then you'd be screaming that the tax forms of those corporations must be publicized also.
Landowners have a stake in the success of the country. Renters have much less of a stake, and are far more likely vote in a manner that makes the maintenance of property difficult.
The United States is a union of states. We are already far too close to being ruled by popular fads, the popular election of the President would make the current situation worse.
Slashdot Mirror
The phrase you are looking for is "per se", meaning "of itself".
Please post your taunts grammatically.
controversy - noun -- disagreement, typically when prolonged, public, and heated.
Please stay on Mars.
Obama appointees think that Americans should be punished for living. I think differently than them, and in this case it's sufficient justification for firing them.
When the department is no longer funded, the issue of firing is moot.
What's this sudden interest in "divesting himself from his business interests?" He's turning over the operation of his businesses to his family, so as to minimize conflicts of interest. Do you actually expect him to liquify his assets? There's nothing that requires the President to take a vow of poverty.
Our greatest President, George Washington, didn't sell his farm when he took office. There's no reason for any other President to act differently.
So the Democrats threatening electors is not an "extraordinary or violent movement"? The Democrats promoting riots outside Trump rallies were "extraordinary or violent movements", and the responsibility of Clinton electors should be to switch their votes to Trump.
Travelgate was the firing of people (by the Clintons) who did nothing wrong. This would not be analogous.
Your new office is in Little America on the Ross Ice Shelf, where your paycheck will be delivered.
Better would be to rig an auto-erase password.
You are mistaken. There are many restrictions on abusive photography, all of them quite reasonable. Some have been established by case law, others by legislation.
Can you rephrase that so that people accustomed to reading English can comprehend it?
I agree with the GP, that the language of the 5th Amendment is clear and applies here, and further that regarding the Constitution as plastic and subject to interpretation leads to disaster. Justice Stephens was wrong in that both the key and the combination are protected by the Fourth and Fifth Amendments; the distinction between them is inconsequential. Judge Black is wrong because his decision violates the Fourth and Fifth Amendments.
He's not asking for pity, Dumbo, he's giving you a free lesson in life that you're too arrogant to recognize.
Nobody really knows what's going to happen when SS runs out of money, but there's a good chance that SS will continue doing what it's doing now (but hiding): take the money from the general fund. If SS were suddenly cut in half, the spurt of recall elections would be dizzying.
Houses and land far enough from cities can be quite affordable. You don't need an indoor swimming pool and bowling alley; a nice house can be $150,000.
The point of having equity and precious metal investments is that to a large extent they track inflation. Of course, if there's a total economic collapse the equity investments will likely be hurt extremely badly, but in a total economic collapse everyone is screwed anyway.
The share price dropping gives the corporation the ability to buy back shares at a lower price. This improves the ability of the company to do things like go private or otherwise defend itself from troublemakers in the general public.
A well established company with ongoing profits needs stockholders like a boat needs a hole.
The only harm that such divestitures cause a company are that some employees who have been rewarded with stock options will see the value of those options fall for a few years until the divestiture fad falls off.
Immigrants are promoting hatred for immigrants in the UK. If you don't make trouble, you don't generate hatred.
Remember, the ultimate reference of wealth is human effort. If an individual cancer cure gives the patient 10 extra years of life but costs 40 man-years of labor, there's a net loss involved for humanity. Under a capitalist system, that tradeoff may be made voluntarily. Under socialized medicine, those treated will be those with political pull and those believed to have most to offer the state. Choose wisely.
It only took a few years for DNA sequencing to go from being a multimillion dollar undertaking to being so routine that ornithologists use it to distinguish separate species from subspecies. I can see that individual cancer cures will require specialized breweries to make the proper cells, but a large part of that ought to be capable of automation some day.
The same CNN poll also says that Trump won among those who were male, who were older, and who were white. I.e. those less inclined to be emotional, who were more experienced, and who didn't have an axe to grind.
Please don't use "in the sack" and "Hillary" in the same sentence, it's nauseating.
Complete nonsequitur.
Furthermore, if there were anything even hinting at a flaw in Trump's tax returns, the already-established-as-corrupt IRS would have "leaked" it.
Remember, Trump does business through corporations he controls. His personal tax returns could easily show nothing but salaries from dozens of corporations. Of course, then you'd be screaming that the tax forms of those corporations must be publicized also.
Landowners have a stake in the success of the country. Renters have much less of a stake, and are far more likely vote in a manner that makes the maintenance of property difficult.
The United States is a union of states. We are already far too close to being ruled by popular fads, the popular election of the President would make the current situation worse.