You're funny. WIndows 3 better than the Mac? No, not at all. When Win3 came out, people were using the Mac to create applications and use apps like Photoshop and Illustrator.
1. It's impossible to make it work on every broswer using old standards. Use standards and make it work regardless of what it may look like.
2. CSS is most certainly not a waste of time. CSS is incredibly useful, allowing designers to separate presentation from content, which allows the page to be viewed (without any special coding) on a multitude of platforms and devices. To call CSS a "waste" reveals a particular ignorance and/or bias.
3. Frames are atrocious. On this we can agree.
4. True geniuses do thier best; talentless hacks spout off with nonsense instead of doing their work.
Slashdot Mirror
You're funny. WIndows 3 better than the Mac? No, not at all. When Win3 came out, people were using the Mac to create applications and use apps like Photoshop and Illustrator.
On Win3, you could... um... use Write.
1. It's impossible to make it work on every broswer using old standards. Use standards and make it work regardless of what it may look like.
2. CSS is most certainly not a waste of time. CSS is incredibly useful, allowing designers to separate presentation from content, which allows the page to be viewed (without any special coding) on a multitude of platforms and devices. To call CSS a "waste" reveals a particular ignorance and/or bias.
3. Frames are atrocious. On this we can agree.
4. True geniuses do thier best; talentless hacks spout off with nonsense instead of doing their work.