No. The French, Italians, Dutch etc all have their own space agencies in addition to ESA. (However I have never seen the acronym FSA used for the French one: it's the CNES, the Centre National d'Etudes spatiales.)
The reason radio telescopes are frikin huge (TM) is that they want a large collecting area to increase sensitivity. The large dishes are mirrors that focus incoming radio waves to a (much smaller) receiver. Their size is nothing to do with the wavelength of the radio waves.
(Also, check the size of your nearest radio receiver capable of picking up long-wave transmissions. Guess what, it's not 1 km long. So you might conclude that humans can indeed in principle be affected by radio waves -- whether they can in practice is another matter altogether of course.)
Too bad this information doesn't show up when you read full item page
I guess at that point you have to read the prominent header in the middle saying 'book review' or the numerous references to 'the book' in the body text...
'obtuse' means stupid. You may mean 'obscure' or 'abstruse'.
More seriously -- there's room for something in between 'basic' and 'go away and use Google Scholar'. Searching the journals is useless if you don't know where to start looking. I've written science wikipedia articles in the area that I specialize in. I try to write them aimed at the level of, say, a first-year undergraduate student. That's still not aimed at the 'average Joe' but then I have to guess who the article is more likely to be useful to.
nslookup -q=mx bristol.edu
Server: 147.197.200.2
Address: 147.197.200.2#53
Non-authoritative answer:
bristol.edu mail exchanger = 5 dirh.bris.ac.uk.
bristol.edu mail exchanger = 6 dirf.bris.ac.uk.
It's not common for British universities to have.edu addresses, but my former employer did, which suggests it's possible.
Not that that provides any support for the original suggestion, which is clearly unworkable...
And the parent was correct -- the original poster is talking nonsense. I'm running MPI code on a cluster consisting of some single-core machines, some 2-CPU boxes, and some 2-CPU 2-core systems. All the cores are in use.
What the previous poster said: powernow works fine on my dual opteron 250 machine.
Also see here: http://electricrain.com/greg/opteron-powersave.txt
if you're running Linux. The setpci trick makes a real difference to my machine's capacity to heat my office.
Um, you're sure that this wasn't a technical problem with playing video on more than one display at once, as is fairly common with cheapo laptop graphics chipsets?
You're right about the burden of proof (which has been mentioned above already) but of course truth (`justification') is a defence. The difficulty is that it is up to you to prove that what you say is true, not up to the plaintiff to show that it is not.
It sounds as though you are talking about what are called in English the moral rights of the creator, which do have some limited equivalent in US law, though not as much as they do in EU countries.
That's 1 *G*eV for a baryon. So baryons dominate over the photon energy density by a large factor and the answer to the original question is yes, it has been thought of, and no, it doesn't make any difference (in the present-day universe). The rest of your argument is pretty much correct, though.
If the weak lensing observations are correct, and it's hard to see how they can be systematically wrong, then MOND is wrong (or, to cover bases, some aspect of our understanding of how to infer masses from *visible* matter is badly wrong).
It's a neat result: no idea why it's getting a press release now, though...
Actually there are a few other systems now where the weak lensing shows a mass distribution significantly different from the X-rays. You might have seen a few last week, though the point wasn't laboured.
p values are a measure of the probability unless otherwise stated. If the OP means the probability of the null hypothesis (which is probably what you mean) he should say so.
Since Gitlow v. New York in 1925 the law of the US has been interpreted in such a way that the Bill of Rights is directly binding on the States. You may say that the 14th amendment was never meant to have that effect, but right now it does, and will continue to do so.
Slashdot Mirror
The OP said 'blind' not 'double-blind'.
No. The French, Italians, Dutch etc all have their own space agencies in addition to ESA. (However I have never seen the acronym FSA used for the French one: it's the CNES, the Centre National d'Etudes spatiales.)
The guardian article doesn't say the servers are in this bunker: the summary is wrong. But then ./ readers aren't known for reading TFA.
(Also, check the size of your nearest radio receiver capable of picking up long-wave transmissions. Guess what, it's not 1 km long. So you might conclude that humans can indeed in principle be affected by radio waves -- whether they can in practice is another matter altogether of course.)
Confusingly, this means he has an undergraduate law degree: this wouldn't on its own be a qualification to practise law. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_of_Arts_(Oxbridge_and_Dublin)
Barcelona is supposed to drop into your existing socket F motherboard with a BIOS update.
'obtuse' means stupid. You may mean 'obscure' or 'abstruse'. More seriously -- there's room for something in between 'basic' and 'go away and use Google Scholar'. Searching the journals is useless if you don't know where to start looking. I've written science wikipedia articles in the area that I specialize in. I try to write them aimed at the level of, say, a first-year undergraduate student. That's still not aimed at the 'average Joe' but then I have to guess who the article is more likely to be useful to.
nslookup -q=mx bristol.edu Server: 147.197.200.2 Address: 147.197.200.2#53 Non-authoritative answer: bristol.edu mail exchanger = 5 dirh.bris.ac.uk. bristol.edu mail exchanger = 6 dirf.bris.ac.uk. It's not common for British universities to have .edu addresses, but my former employer did, which suggests it's possible.
Not that that provides any support for the original suggestion, which is clearly unworkable...
And the parent was correct -- the original poster is talking nonsense. I'm running MPI code on a cluster consisting of some single-core machines, some 2-CPU boxes, and some 2-CPU 2-core systems. All the cores are in use.
What the previous poster said: powernow works fine on my dual opteron 250 machine. Also see here: http://electricrain.com/greg/opteron-powersave.txt
if you're running Linux. The setpci trick makes a real difference to my machine's capacity to heat my office.
Compare `kilowatt-hour'.
Um, you're sure that this wasn't a technical problem with playing video on more than one display at once, as is fairly common with cheapo laptop graphics chipsets?
You're right about the burden of proof (which has been mentioned above already) but of course truth (`justification') is a defence. The difficulty is that it is up to you to prove that what you say is true, not up to the plaintiff to show that it is not.
Sure, I bought one a couple of weeks ago. http://www.leadtek.com/3d_graphic/winfast_a7600_gt tdh_1.html
It sounds as though you are talking about what are called in English the moral rights of the creator, which do have some limited equivalent in US law, though not as much as they do in EU countries.
That's 1 *G*eV for a baryon. So baryons dominate over the photon energy density by a large factor and the answer to the original question is yes, it has been thought of, and no, it doesn't make any difference (in the present-day universe). The rest of your argument is pretty much correct, though.
If the weak lensing observations are correct, and it's hard to see how they can be systematically wrong, then MOND is wrong (or, to cover bases, some aspect of our understanding of how to infer masses from *visible* matter is badly wrong). It's a neat result: no idea why it's getting a press release now, though...
Actually there are a few other systems now where the weak lensing shows a mass distribution significantly different from the X-rays. You might have seen a few last week, though the point wasn't laboured.
I'm running AMD64 Debian stable, like many other people. Just google for AMD64 sarge.
If you read all of the debian-devel-announce posting you will see that it does in fact contain a specific date.
p values are a measure of the probability unless otherwise stated. If the OP means the probability of the null hypothesis (which is probably what you mean) he should say so.
Since Gitlow v. New York in 1925 the law of the US has been interpreted in such a way that the Bill of Rights is directly binding on the States. You may say that the 14th amendment was never meant to have that effect, but right now it does, and will continue to do so.