In order to work at the bank I was required to be fingerprinted, drug tested, and had my credit and police record pulled.
I always find it a bit disturbing when someone I've had to turn down opening an account for flips out that I've aquired their social security number. I've had people go from polite to wanting to speak to my manager and threatening to get their lawyer on the bank because I had to take a copy of the form that says we are declining their business. I just want to know...What do they think I want their horrible credit record for anyway?
"A judge is often (if not always) a more qualified and objective party when any of us."
While a judge may be more qualified to interpret the law than the average citizen,no one is ever objective, unless they lived in a bubble without sensory stimuli. That has been proven impossible; hence,we are all objective to some degree based upon our own personal experiences, prejudices or things we hear from trusted sources. Aside from new evidence appearing in a case, there would be no need for an appeal process if judges were truly objective.
In order to work at the bank I was required to be fingerprinted, drug tested, and had my credit and police record pulled. I always find it a bit disturbing when someone I've had to turn down opening an account for flips out that I've aquired their social security number. I've had people go from polite to wanting to speak to my manager and threatening to get their lawyer on the bank because I had to take a copy of the form that says we are declining their business. I just want to know...What do they think I want their horrible credit record for anyway?
"A judge is often (if not always) a more qualified and objective party when any of us."
While a judge may be more qualified to interpret the law than the average citizen,no one is ever objective, unless they lived in a bubble without sensory stimuli. That has been proven impossible; hence,we are all objective to some degree based upon our own personal experiences, prejudices or things we hear from trusted sources.
Aside from new evidence appearing in a case, there would be no need for an appeal process if judges were truly objective.