I am not keeping the device that long, feel free to kill the flash. I would rather replace it yearly than have to reload a webpage i was just looking at.
The problem is instead of swapping the application out to disk, Android kills it. This means the application has to be loaded back up and loses its state. This means the web browser will refresh a page, which it was just on if you switched to another memory intensive application since you last used the web browser.
The OS should just swap the application out to disk and bring it back in when needed. Killing the app should only be done when you are out of SWAP and RAM.
Modern OS's figured this out long ago, why must we reinvent the computer with new hardware it runs on?
They still charge for the encoder. Because VP8 is good enough and FREE, is why the big hassle is there. Giving up some performance to get out from under the MPEG-LA's thumb is well worth it.
Try postmaster at that url. The email address should in theory exist and someone should get it.
If this is not the case drag the owner into the street and beat him within an inch of his life. People who don't follow the email RFCs are some of the worst scum on earth.
The reality is Steam offers something not yet available on linux AAA games, even if out of date so far. You don't have to use it, and you can avoid distros that package it even, but it exists for those who want to use it.
Vmware does not offer more workloads per server or lower hardware cost. While competitors call those things by different names many of them are available.
Heck, VMware only recently gained GPU passthrough and does it yet have passthrough for arbitrary devices?
This is what happens when an MBA type person runs a tech company. He thinks more about brand and reputation than being the best in the market. He thinks marketing and commercials can replace good products that offer great value.
I have seen vmware virtual center swear a machine was running that was not. I got to migrate everything onto another machine in the cluster and reboot that host. This was what support had me do as we got so far down the road and I really needed that VM back up.
Nothing is perfect. The issue is the costs are not a few hundred per host, that would be acceptable. VMware will need to reduce its cost or it will lose market share.
Slashdot Mirror
Not worth the power gained. I would rather waste it than wait for the page to reload.
I am not keeping the device that long, feel free to kill the flash. I would rather replace it yearly than have to reload a webpage i was just looking at.
Since you can't redistribute even 1 cent is too much.
Then every android browser is a crap application.
All of them reload the page if they happen to get killed off.
The solution is to give me 128GB+ of storage and let me treat it like a full PC. That is what I want.
The problem is instead of swapping the application out to disk, Android kills it. This means the application has to be loaded back up and loses its state. This means the web browser will refresh a page, which it was just on if you switched to another memory intensive application since you last used the web browser.
This is why we have SWAP.
The OS should just swap the application out to disk and bring it back in when needed. Killing the app should only be done when you are out of SWAP and RAM.
Modern OS's figured this out long ago, why must we reinvent the computer with new hardware it runs on?
It does it poorly.
Android far too aggressively swaps apps out. It made sense when phones had 256MB of ram, it does not today.
Yes, Most people are using some other DOOM engine with original WADs.
What do you mean willing? Is DOOM now a form of punishment?
Dosbox is not that fast, and it targets pretty generic ARM so I am almost certain this was done to get usable performance in a DOS emulator.
People still play DOOM, I still play DOOM2 online every once in a while.
I have SCUMMVM installed on my smartphone so I can play games of similar vintage.
I guess it is something us older folks do. Kids these days, off my lawn, etc.
In theory yes, but the odds of a webmaster account existing is even lower.
They still charge for the encoder.
Because VP8 is good enough and FREE, is why the big hassle is there. Giving up some performance to get out from under the MPEG-LA's thumb is well worth it.
So when it comes time for MS to dish out more FUD Florian shows up? What a fucking surprise.
Try postmaster at that url.
The email address should in theory exist and someone should get it.
If this is not the case drag the owner into the street and beat him within an inch of his life. People who don't follow the email RFCs are some of the worst scum on earth.
I believe you were looking for this:
http://www.playdeb.net/welcome/
The reality is Steam offers something not yet available on linux AAA games, even if out of date so far. You don't have to use it, and you can avoid distros that package it even, but it exists for those who want to use it.
When did MBA become a race?
These people choose to damage their brains in this way, then you want me to avoid saying bad things about them?
Removing the user flaw, has costs that are not acceptable.
No, this is a truth. I say that because one day you will find it out yourself. Once you trade freedom for security you will have and get neither.
Try KVM.
The tools are far more sane, and even easily scriptable.
You left out, enable iscsi which was CLI only until 5, add drivers for any device not in the ESXi disk, etc.
Vmware does not offer more workloads per server or lower hardware cost. While competitors call those things by different names many of them are available.
Heck, VMware only recently gained GPU passthrough and does it yet have passthrough for arbitrary devices?
The competitors do all those fine.
Paying more does not get a better product.
This is what happens when an MBA type person runs a tech company. He thinks more about brand and reputation than being the best in the market. He thinks marketing and commercials can replace good products that offer great value.
I have seen vmware virtual center swear a machine was running that was not. I got to migrate everything onto another machine in the cluster and reboot that host. This was what support had me do as we got so far down the road and I really needed that VM back up.
Nothing is perfect. The issue is the costs are not a few hundred per host, that would be acceptable. VMware will need to reduce its cost or it will lose market share.
No live migration, no centralized management, none of the features the competitors offer for free.
Not when HyperV, Xenserver, Xen and KVM all do that for free.