Good for you. A Civic is nothing like a model S. One day the electric car that fits your needs will exist, this is a stepping stone to that day. Only the cheapest Model S would need 3 charges to cover that distance, most orders are for a model that only need 1 recharge.
Actually this is limited to 10 out of market apps, android has no such limitation. Also this is a pay for feature, again android does not charge for this.
So you are wrong even with this new notion of "open".
Because GAPPS which is not part of android, and is something google requires you to get a license for. It would be like if they bundled flash with the OS.
It does not matter what they do, without code reading apps can always do evil.
I could submit a time zone calculator app that waits until 06/06/2012 and instead of opening properly shows goatse. With the limited testing apple does how would they ever know?
It was only a matter of time. Since they only do blackbox testing, it should not have taken this long for an app to get approved that waits to do evil until after it is in the wild.
Re:Only "troubled" if you're not Lockheed Martin
on
The F-35 Story
·
· Score: 1
It costs more, it is less able to deal with changing situation on the ground etc. You sound like those Vietnam era generals that left the guns off the F4 since dogfighting was dead.
Re:Marine version tripped up the whole program
on
The F-35 Story
·
· Score: 1
No, over political prestige I did mention pointless already.
possibly enormous oil reserves. And maybe a big mountain made of candy! How about determining if it is worth fighting over first?
The RAF bombing British people on the Falklands might not be considered a good idea. If there are all these brits on the islands, why are they not fighting off the occupiers.
Re:Only "troubled" if you're not Lockheed Martin
on
The F-35 Story
·
· Score: 2
Sadly they intend to replace the A-10 with the F-35. It will be a far more expensive way to kill tanks. As a bonus it will also burn more fuel to do the same job, while being more fragile.
Re:Marine version tripped up the whole program
on
The F-35 Story
·
· Score: 1
A pointless war? Over a couple sheep and some rocks?
A better policy might just be informing the occupants of said pile of rocks to GTFO or you will bomb it until it is below sea level. If you really desire to get them off such useless property.
Re:Best comment in article:
on
The F-35 Story
·
· Score: 1
Do you really not know what a Harrier Jump jet is? Are you not able to access google?
Re:Affordable replacement for something paid for
on
The F-35 Story
·
· Score: 1
Why? You think we are going to forget how to build them?
Re:Only "troubled" if you're not Lockheed Martin
on
The F-35 Story
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
The alternative is the company gets their 66 billion and either has to deliver the plane or the money back.
Re:Only "troubled" if you're not Lockheed Martin
on
The F-35 Story
·
· Score: 2
yes, purpose built-aircraft/are/ better than other aircraft at fulfilling their purpose
Considering we are talking about the F-35 Jack of all Trades, Master of none, that is a pretty funny thing to mention. The thing was built to be everything to everyone. That is just a great way to make sure it fills no ones needs well and costs more than anyone wanted to pay.
Re:Best comment in article:
on
The F-35 Story
·
· Score: 1
I do not believe so. The normal F-35 does not have it either. Yet, another step backward from the F-22.
The F-35 contract was based on the fact that it looked nicer than the boeing aircraft. Boeing underestimated how much coolness factor goes into aircraft selection. They focused on things like meeting design goals.
Slashdot Mirror
Traffic is not going to be as bad as in a gas car. Going slower will conserve energy, being stopped wastes no power, etc.
Still those estimates are usually pretty optimistic so it seems possible that a 200 mile drive would not be possible with only a rated 230 mile range.
Good for you. A Civic is nothing like a model S. One day the electric car that fits your needs will exist, this is a stepping stone to that day. Only the cheapest Model S would need 3 charges to cover that distance, most orders are for a model that only need 1 recharge.
The power density will be plenty low enough, the beam width will just huge.
The pashtun in Afghanistan have none of that and are still giving the coalition a hard time.
Actually this is limited to 10 out of market apps, android has no such limitation. Also this is a pay for feature, again android does not charge for this.
So you are wrong even with this new notion of "open".
Because GAPPS which is not part of android, and is something google requires you to get a license for. It would be like if they bundled flash with the OS.
Are you really this dense?
Are you running the standard OS or third party one? Have you overclocked it?
Even then I find such a claim hard to believe, on the latest iOS update for those things they really slow to a crawl.
I never even tried the browser it came with, and have always had it clocked over 1Ghz.
Now you are really going off the deepend. The only thing google did was get them to stop distributing the GAPPS bundle. That is it.
http://source.android.com/source/downloading.html
That page sure disagrees with you.
That is a lot different than installing an unapproved app. Take a look at how that tether works for starters.
BullFuckingShit. Very few android phones have unknown sources blocked and all those can have apps installed in other ways.
When I can do a git of the Windows phone code, then it is starting to get close.
I meant code reviews. They would also have to reject any app more complicated than the most basic of software.
It does not matter what they do, without code reading apps can always do evil.
I could submit a time zone calculator app that waits until 06/06/2012 and instead of opening properly shows goatse. With the limited testing apple does how would they ever know?
So then why has no one just built an app that is friendly until 10k downloads at which point it does some evil?
To me it seems like something spammers/malware folks would have thought of by now
It was only a matter of time. Since they only do blackbox testing, it should not have taken this long for an app to get approved that waits to do evil until after it is in the wild.
It costs more, it is less able to deal with changing situation on the ground etc. You sound like those Vietnam era generals that left the guns off the F4 since dogfighting was dead.
No, over political prestige
I did mention pointless already.
possibly enormous oil reserves.
And maybe a big mountain made of candy! How about determining if it is worth fighting over first?
The RAF bombing British people on the Falklands might not be considered a good idea.
If there are all these brits on the islands, why are they not fighting off the occupiers.
Sadly they intend to replace the A-10 with the F-35. It will be a far more expensive way to kill tanks. As a bonus it will also burn more fuel to do the same job, while being more fragile.
A pointless war? Over a couple sheep and some rocks?
A better policy might just be informing the occupants of said pile of rocks to GTFO or you will bomb it until it is below sea level. If you really desire to get them off such useless property.
Do you really not know what a Harrier Jump jet is?
Are you not able to access google?
Out Demons of stupidity and Ignorance, be gone from this poor fellow!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harrier_Jump_Jet
Why?
You think we are going to forget how to build them?
The alternative is the company gets their 66 billion and either has to deliver the plane or the money back.
yes, purpose built-aircraft /are/ better than other aircraft at fulfilling their purpose
Considering we are talking about the F-35 Jack of all Trades, Master of none, that is a pretty funny thing to mention. The thing was built to be everything to everyone. That is just a great way to make sure it fills no ones needs well and costs more than anyone wanted to pay.
I do not believe so.
The normal F-35 does not have it either. Yet, another step backward from the F-22.
The F-35 contract was based on the fact that it looked nicer than the boeing aircraft. Boeing underestimated how much coolness factor goes into aircraft selection. They focused on things like meeting design goals.