Actually I am not worried about that one bit. I am worried about all the fucking money we waste putting people in jail for something so pointless, I think you might call that a debt problem. You don't think that making people felons and in some instances depriving them of life is a big deal, I would think you might call it a social issue.
Quite right, It also means we need to make a new petition.
Why are you even holding this if you are going to respond in such a dismissive manner to every suggestion? What is the purpose of wasting everyones time when you knew from the beginning that you would do this? Instead of dismissing this petition just as flippantly, we urge you to go back and act on the other petitions.
Read the one about marijuana. Same sort of nicely worded fuck you, but with the added benefit of lies about effects and completely unsubstantiated claims!
They would have more time available if they tried going to work. What other job pays for the full year but only makes you come in 1/3 of the normal work days?
You prove you can't fucking read, how you can type is a wonder for the ages.
Just to see if you catch it this time; I did mention poor car design, which would include a self driving car that crashed. That would be pretty poor fucking design.
I hope they got them into a rehab program too. Who the hell was giving these little bastards booze? They can't possibly be opening the bottles themselves.
Google has run roughshod over everyone else's IP. Some of it may be legit but it is a consistent pattern. For example, who would deny that YouTube is built off of loads of clips from copyrighted materials? google profits from this immensely even if they did not upload the copyrighted material themselves. If they did not upload it, it is not their problem. They remove when they are asked to.
Google news completely rips off and sublinks to copyrighted news content without compensation or even requesting permission. If the news websites did not like this they could easily change their robots.txt to avoid google spidering their site.
Their android runs afoul of Microsoft and Apple IP. Don't take my word for it: manufacturers and courts have voted with their pocket books and injunctions. Google profits enormously from adoption of android since it enhances user adoption of the google ecosystem. In the current world of bullshit software programs all non-trivial software infringes on someones bullshit patent.
As a consumer I of course benefit from all this. But producers of content are getting hurt. Producers seem to be doing fine, stop worrying about them.
I am not a scientist nor a statistician, but I am fairly certain more than one person has died in an automobile accident. In fact some died in accidents that were the result of poor car design. How would this be any different?
This has nothing to do with government bureaucrats, nor does it matter for your wife. No one wants to take away healthcare, they just want to know if on the whole it is worth it to keep going down this track.
The reality is treating someone who will die no matter what, if the treatment does not extend life by much is not medically worth it. If treatment adds only a month of life, a painful puking near death month, why bother? On the flipside, how many people are being treated and just did not need to be? Quality of life is much bigger issue than money.
Holding costs down is just as important if you pay out of pocket, as if you have insurance or national healthcare.
Ignoring cost there is another important factor here, quality of life.
There is little point in killing 70 year olds on the operating table to attempt to remove a cancer that would not have killed them for another 40 years.
Slashdot Mirror
Online, electronic, internet, or lots of other normal words that can already describe these sort of things. No new alternative is needed.
Can we all just agree not to use the word "Cyber" anymore? It sound like some sort of silly late 80s early 90s grade B film.
Actually I am not worried about that one bit. I am worried about all the fucking money we waste putting people in jail for something so pointless, I think you might call that a debt problem. You don't think that making people felons and in some instances depriving them of life is a big deal, I would think you might call it a social issue.
Bullshit. These are the folks that elected the butcher of Beirut. One side is as guilty as the other.
How many of the people who did that are still alive?
What happened then has nothing to do with what is happening now.
I believe you mean from any administration.
Politicians are all cut from the same cloth.
Quite right, It also means we need to make a new petition.
Why are you even holding this if you are going to respond in such a dismissive manner to every suggestion? What is the purpose of wasting everyones time when you knew from the beginning that you would do this? Instead of dismissing this petition just as flippantly, we urge you to go back and act on the other petitions.
Read the one about marijuana. Same sort of nicely worded fuck you, but with the added benefit of lies about effects and completely unsubstantiated claims!
Nope, neither of the collaborators do. The guy who owns the cloud does. For proof look at who can delete it permanently.
They would have more time available if they tried going to work. What other job pays for the full year but only makes you come in 1/3 of the normal work days?
You prove you can't fucking read, how you can type is a wonder for the ages.
Just to see if you catch it this time;
I did mention poor car design, which would include a self driving car that crashed. That would be pretty poor fucking design.
Says the MS fanboi.
I hope they got them into a rehab program too. Who the hell was giving these little bastards booze? They can't possibly be opening the bottles themselves.
In the current world of bullshit software programs all non-trivial software infringes on someones bullshit patent.
That was supposed to say:
In the current world of bullshit software patents all non-trivial software infringes on someones bullshit patent.
You left out the best part, we can start drinking in cars! No more expensive taxi rides, just have the car take you home after a night at the bar.
Think of all the lives saved by DWI no longer being a problem.
Google has run roughshod over everyone else's IP. Some of it may be legit but it is a consistent pattern. For example, who would deny that YouTube is built off of loads of clips from copyrighted materials? google profits from this immensely even if they did not upload the copyrighted material themselves.
If they did not upload it, it is not their problem. They remove when they are asked to.
Google news completely rips off and sublinks to copyrighted news content without compensation or even requesting permission.
If the news websites did not like this they could easily change their robots.txt to avoid google spidering their site.
Their android runs afoul of Microsoft and Apple IP. Don't take my word for it: manufacturers and courts have voted with their pocket books and injunctions. Google profits enormously from adoption of android since it enhances user adoption of the google ecosystem.
In the current world of bullshit software programs all non-trivial software infringes on someones bullshit patent.
As a consumer I of course benefit from all this. But producers of content are getting hurt.
Producers seem to be doing fine, stop worrying about them.
You missed the part about deaths occurring due to poor engineering in automobiles. This has already happened and the company involved still exists.
I am not a scientist nor a statistician, but I am fairly certain more than one person has died in an automobile accident. In fact some died in accidents that were the result of poor car design.
How would this be any different?
I am going to bet they won't be installing pirated apps from Chinese third party markets. Stick to amazon and google and you will do just fine.
How do you plan to make a home without any metal objects?
How cheap do you think liquid hydrogen/helium are?
Bzzt, wrong.
The USA has one of the shortest life expectancies in the first world.
This has nothing to do with government bureaucrats, nor does it matter for your wife. No one wants to take away healthcare, they just want to know if on the whole it is worth it to keep going down this track.
The reality is treating someone who will die no matter what, if the treatment does not extend life by much is not medically worth it. If treatment adds only a month of life, a painful puking near death month, why bother? On the flipside, how many people are being treated and just did not need to be? Quality of life is much bigger issue than money.
I wish your wife well.
Government care would be cheaper, for evidence look around the world.
This is about not torturing people with pointless treatments, not saving a couple bucks.
Holding costs down is just as important if you pay out of pocket, as if you have insurance or national healthcare.
Ignoring cost there is another important factor here, quality of life.
There is little point in killing 70 year olds on the operating table to attempt to remove a cancer that would not have killed them for another 40 years.
So how do you plan to deal with people who have no insurance and need care? Let them die?
Or how about folks with no car insurance and no money to pay for the damage they caused?