Let me get this straight: If the inability to reproduce is not a "side affect" then it must be the main "affect" therefore making the doubled life-span a "side affect" of their new "anti-fertility treatment." I knew those nasty scientist were trying to kill us all off...
The same spam I get in my Hotmail hit me last week through Windows messenger: "U N I V E R S I T Y D I P L O M A S" Notice the spacing designed to avoid word filtering? It looks like these guys are thinking ahead!
Slashdot Mirror
Let me get this straight:
If the inability to reproduce is not a "side affect" then it must be the main "affect" therefore making the doubled life-span a "side affect" of their new "anti-fertility treatment." I knew those nasty scientist were trying to kill us all off...
The same spam I get in my Hotmail hit me last week through Windows messenger:
"U N I V E R S I T Y D I P L O M A S"
Notice the spacing designed to avoid word filtering? It looks like these guys are thinking ahead!