So, why not wait to the next IE version and see "where we are able to go today"? WC3 is the standard, not IE. IE is not standards compliant, and you wishing it was seems pretty stupid... IMHO, we should all look for standards so next versions of IE will be more standards compliant IN THE FUTURE. It's the base on "standards": it's something public that everyone should follow, quite like law... But what if you cross a street and some asshole policeman arrests you for "just released law breaking"? That's not cool, i guess.
Nope. When talking about language's security we talk about security in mod_perl, mod_php and their implementations. You wont be able to hack much if you base yourself on bugs on the web apps. You'd better go for the true software. Anyway, PHP roolz and IS more secure than perl for web applications, basically because *that* is what it was designed for: WWW.
So, why not wait to the next IE version and see "where we are able to go today"? WC3 is the standard, not IE. IE is not standards compliant, and you wishing it was seems pretty stupid... IMHO, we should all look for standards so next versions of IE will be more standards compliant IN THE FUTURE.
It's the base on "standards": it's something public that everyone should follow, quite like law...
But what if you cross a street and some asshole policeman arrests you for "just released law breaking"?
That's not cool, i guess.
My english is sow sow (really)
Nope.
When talking about language's security we talk about security in mod_perl, mod_php and their implementations.
You wont be able to hack much if you base yourself on bugs on the web apps. You'd better go for the true software.
Anyway, PHP roolz and IS more secure than perl for web applications, basically because *that* is what it was designed for: WWW.