They even mention MythBusters in the fricken article. They then go on to describe the differences between what MB did and what MIT did (MIT used wood that the ships were made out of, they also stained the ships. MB used a harder wood and a different mirror array)
Oh, and they set the ship on fire. I guess this is another case of MB not being accurate. I suppose thats what you get when you have special effects artists running "scientific" experiments.
Ahh, but what you indirectly propose has been tested.
Twins were seperated at birth. They found eachother when they were in their 40's. They are equally happy, to the point that the psychologist(?) who interviewed them nicknamed them the "Giggle twins".
granted, two subjects are not nearly enough for a serious experiment in psychiatry(sp).
I think I saw this on dateline so don't forget your salt.
The question is not so much whether the code conflicts with eachother but rather if the conflict was intentional. The only way the code will tell the truth on that is if you get comments like//Die lotus die
You forgot the 0th law
A robot may not harm humanity, or through inaction allow humanity to be harmed.
Yep, law 1.5 definetly has a conflict with law 0 when applied to my room (and where is one supposed to put the toxic waste?)
Slashdot Mirror
They even mention MythBusters in the fricken article. They then go on to describe the differences between what MB did and what MIT did (MIT used wood that the ships were made out of, they also stained the ships. MB used a harder wood and a different mirror array) Oh, and they set the ship on fire. I guess this is another case of MB not being accurate. I suppose thats what you get when you have special effects artists running "scientific" experiments.
Ahh, but what you indirectly propose has been tested. Twins were seperated at birth. They found eachother when they were in their 40's. They are equally happy, to the point that the psychologist(?) who interviewed them nicknamed them the "Giggle twins". granted, two subjects are not nearly enough for a serious experiment in psychiatry(sp). I think I saw this on dateline so don't forget your salt.
The question is not so much whether the code conflicts with eachother but rather if the conflict was intentional. The only way the code will tell the truth on that is if you get comments like //Die lotus die
You forgot the 0th law A robot may not harm humanity, or through inaction allow humanity to be harmed. Yep, law 1.5 definetly has a conflict with law 0 when applied to my room (and where is one supposed to put the toxic waste?)
yes, all electoral votes were counted, but not all votes from the voters were counted. Votes from the electoral college != votes from voters.