The article in the Registrar was not a thoughtful and thorough.
PIR has issued re-buttle.
Please read the PIR comments and other blogss in:
1. We also wrote to the author of the article for The Register, and he has
updated the original article
http://theregister.co.uk/content/6/30760.html
2. As you've seen from ICANNWatch
(http://www.icannwatch.org/article.pl?sid=03/05/19/1422220&mode=thread), we
also posted there and have had some additional positive notes posted by
others in the community.
3. In addition, we reached out to the industry press, including Bret Fausett
(ICANN Blog at http://icann.blog.us/2003/05/19.html#a1356), and explained
the mis-information that was propagated by The Register.
S. S. Kshatriy
Member,.ORG Advisory Council.
The article in the Registrar was not a thoughtful and thorough. PIR has issued re-buttle. Please read the PIR comments and other blogss in: 1. We also wrote to the author of the article for The Register, and he has updated the original article http://theregister.co.uk/content/6/30760.html 2. As you've seen from ICANNWatch (http://www.icannwatch.org/article.pl?sid=03/05/19 /1422220&mode=thread), we
also posted there and have had some additional positive notes posted by
others in the community.
3. In addition, we reached out to the industry press, including Bret Fausett
(ICANN Blog at http://icann.blog.us/2003/05/19.html#a1356), and explained
the mis-information that was propagated by The Register.
S. S. Kshatriy
Member, .ORG Advisory Council.