Only if you can add the entire domain to your address book. It would be rather unusual to do all correspondence with a prospective employer at a single e-mail address.
Windows makes you restart the whole OS for hardware configuration changes.
Not anymore. It's rare to have to reboot XP for any sort of hardware change. In fact, most of the 3rd-party drivers that tell the user they must reboot are wrong (or maybe covering their asses); simply click 'no' and you can continue working.
Interesting; thanks for the info. Unless I'm mistaken though, there's no built-in way to launch files in different apps based on the extended file properties.
So what do you consider to be an alternative? Up until my first install of FreeBSD a few days ago I'd always used MS products, so I'm not really aware of how such things work in *nix. I just know that almost anything would be better than how Windows handles it right now.
I think it is definitely because of the fact that Apple is known for/touts the UI in its products. More specifically though, people pay a high premium to get the Mac UI, and are therefore less forgiving of its faults.
Slashdot Mirror
Only if you can add the entire domain to your address book. It would be rather unusual to do all correspondence with a prospective employer at a single e-mail address.
Windows makes you restart the whole OS for hardware configuration changes.
Not anymore. It's rare to have to reboot XP for any sort of hardware change. In fact, most of the 3rd-party drivers that tell the user they must reboot are wrong (or maybe covering their asses); simply click 'no' and you can continue working.
Somehow I suspect we would end up with ATI-style drivers, NVIDIA-style hardware, and MS-style monopoly pricing to boot.
Interesting; thanks for the info. Unless I'm mistaken though, there's no built-in way to launch files in different apps based on the extended file properties.
So what do you consider to be an alternative? Up until my first install of FreeBSD a few days ago I'd always used MS products, so I'm not really aware of how such things work in *nix. I just know that almost anything would be better than how Windows handles it right now.
I think it is definitely because of the fact that Apple is known for/touts the UI in its products. More specifically though, people pay a high premium to get the Mac UI, and are therefore less forgiving of its faults.
I for one understand it, and I can't wait until a version of NTFS comes out that steals the idea. :) Well, either that or an x86 port of Jaguar.
The .doc format hasn't changed since Office 97. Though I agree with the general point about MS changing formats so no one can make an effective clone.
Wonder how many would be needed to get an equivelant score of 2.5MKeys/sec though...
If you use the RIAA definition of "equivalent"... probably about 5.
Simply fly in as far as the power source will allow then either recover the device later or hope the images you have are worth the cost of losing it.
I think the neighbor girl might notice.