Slashdot Mirror


User: raudi

raudi's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4

  1. Re:512 kBit/s bandwith? on Skype 2.0 Adds Video · · Score: 1

    Where did you get the information that it's 320x240@16fps? even with this resolution 512kbps is not really fantastic, assuming that most pixels will stay the same from one image to the next...

  2. Re:512 kBit/s bandwith? on Skype 2.0 Adds Video · · Score: 1

    sure, upstream=downstream if nothing is magically added or (not so magically) lost. but you realy do think they need 512kbps? that seems a lot to me. i doubt that the mayority of skype users has 512kbps upstream well i guess i'll hove to try it myself...

  3. Re:512 kBit/s bandwith? on Skype 2.0 Adds Video · · Score: 1

    It's hard to find anybody not having 512kbps *downstream* but there are a lot that do not have 512kbps *upstream* at least here in switzerland. so i'm still wondering: - if there is an official information on the needed bandwith - if they really need 512kbps

  4. 512 kBit/s bandwith? on Skype 2.0 Adds Video · · Score: 3, Informative

    On the german newsticker http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/66829 it was stated that a "ADSL-Line with 512 kBit/s" is needed. everybody is wondering if they mean a ADSL with 512kBit/s downstream or if they realy need a bandwith of 512kBit/s. any clues? any official information on what bandwith is needed? anybody already tested it? cheers raudi