Yeah tell me about it. I work at a small ISP, and we have had several calls about this. First time, couldn't figure it, second time I figured it out.
What a bugger.
This actually happens all the time in schools all over the country. Schools think that Seperation of Church and State means that Students cannot do anything remotely religious at school.
Here are some cases:
I believe in due process also, but the ACLU doesn't fight for due process, they fight for the rights of the pornographers to peddle child porn.
case in point:
The Child Pornography Prevention Act (CPPA). Through the CPPA, Congress amended the definition of "child pornography" to include "any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer generated image or picture" where:
(A) the production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(B) such visual depiction is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(C) such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(D) such visual depiction is advertised, promoted, presented, described, or distributed in such a manner that conveys the impression that the material is or contains a visual depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct.
The ACLU is fighting to make child pornography legal.
That is actually untrue. When Christian students cannot have a Bible Study at school during free time, but all other groups can meet, I don't see our local ACLU joinging in to help protect these student's freedoms. When someone wants to post porn of 5 year old kids on the internet, the ACLU will fight tooth and nail to defend their freedoms.
The ACLU is not for freedom, they are for anything Anti-Christian.
My.02 Cents.
I agree. This is not a bad idea, but the best thing would be for parents to do their job and monitor their children. You (hopefully) wouldn't allow you 5 year old to watch anything he/she wants on TV, you shouldn't do the same on the Internet.
But still, I think this is a good idea. The people who are crying censorship are missing the point. It is opt-in, and the rest of the internet is out there if you don't want to "censor" your children.
Well I think it is a good idea for certain institutions (banks, financial, hospitals), but I think for other companies, it does not affect their customers.
Besides, government has too much power...
How can California insist that anyone make it public when they are hacked? Do they insist it is made public when a company is physically broken into? I doubt it. This will just cause companies to not even call the police in order to save their reputation.
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah tell me about it. I work at a small ISP, and we have had several calls about this. First time, couldn't figure it, second time I figured it out. What a bugger.
Good News Club V. MILFORD CENTRAL SCHOOL No. 99-2036
Board of Ed. of Westside Comm. Schools v. Mergens, 496 US 226
I believe in due process also, but the ACLU doesn't fight for due process, they fight for the rights of the pornographers to peddle child porn. case in point:
The Child Pornography Prevention Act (CPPA). Through the CPPA, Congress amended the definition of "child pornography" to include "any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer generated image or picture" where:
(A) the production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(B) such visual depiction is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(C) such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(D) such visual depiction is advertised, promoted, presented, described, or distributed in such a manner that conveys the impression that the material is or contains a visual depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct.
The ACLU is fighting to make child pornography legal.
That is actually untrue. When Christian students cannot have a Bible Study at school during free time, but all other groups can meet, I don't see our local ACLU joinging in to help protect these student's freedoms. When someone wants to post porn of 5 year old kids on the internet, the ACLU will fight tooth and nail to defend their freedoms. The ACLU is not for freedom, they are for anything Anti-Christian. My .02 Cents.
It has been moved to the correct place: 1984.
No, it sucks to be your kids.
I don't expect you to pretend you are pious. I would rather you keep your disgusting comments to yourself.
I agree. This is not a bad idea, but the best thing would be for parents to do their job and monitor their children. You (hopefully) wouldn't allow you 5 year old to watch anything he/she wants on TV, you shouldn't do the same on the Internet. But still, I think this is a good idea. The people who are crying censorship are missing the point. It is opt-in, and the rest of the internet is out there if you don't want to "censor" your children.
You are disgusting. That is not even remotely funny.
Well I think it is a good idea for certain institutions (banks, financial, hospitals), but I think for other companies, it does not affect their customers. Besides, government has too much power...
How can California insist that anyone make it public when they are hacked? Do they insist it is made public when a company is physically broken into? I doubt it. This will just cause companies to not even call the police in order to save their reputation.