"the people" means the same "people" that have these other rights:
First Amendment: "...or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances"
Fourth Amendment: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
No one questions if the First or Fourth Amendments apply to individuals, why should the Second Amendment be any different?
From the article:
"The impacts would have injected steam into the atmosphere, both melted from the surface and from the asteroids and meteors themselves. This would have rained onto the surface "at a rate of about 2 meters (six feet) per year," they wrote."
Also from the article:
"Only during the brief years or decades after the impact events would Mars have been temperate..."
So they are saying that approximately 2 meters of rain fell per years for a period of ranging from years or decades. That sounds like "a lot of water flowing for a fairly long time (years, not days)."
Oh what shall we do?!?
Seriously, who really cares if they take People and the like and make them AOL-only? I thought most people who read these magazines did so at the news stand or in the checkout line at the supermarket or at the doctor's office anyway.
Slashdot Mirror
"the people" means the same "people" that have these other rights:
First Amendment: "...or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances"
Fourth Amendment: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
No one questions if the First or Fourth Amendments apply to individuals, why should the Second Amendment be any different?
From the article: "The impacts would have injected steam into the atmosphere, both melted from the surface and from the asteroids and meteors themselves. This would have rained onto the surface "at a rate of about 2 meters (six feet) per year," they wrote."
Also from the article: "Only during the brief years or decades after the impact events would Mars have been temperate..."
So they are saying that approximately 2 meters of rain fell per years for a period of ranging from years or decades. That sounds like "a lot of water flowing for a fairly long time (years, not days)."
Oh what shall we do?!? Seriously, who really cares if they take People and the like and make them AOL-only? I thought most people who read these magazines did so at the news stand or in the checkout line at the supermarket or at the doctor's office anyway.
This should work: http://www-3.ibm.com/software/speech/handheld/vvms .html
Maybe this is a step in the right direction for you: http://www-3.ibm.com/software/speech/handheld/vvms _sr.html
but that -178 Celsius surface temp sure puts a damper on things.
Isn't that enough?