I couldn't find OSS staples of Java development: Tomcat, Hibernate, Rhino, Spring, Xerces, Xalan, JSON, Jakarta Commons, etc. I wonder by what criteria projects were initially included.
It seems y'all are missing the mark. There are API provisions and bandwidth allotment for app-to-app connectivity. It the applications that are social, not necessarily the developers or users. I'm intrigued.
Why would Mmmm'soft prohibit Office from running on a foreign.NET framework? It is costing them nothing to put it there, they won't have to support it, and it would counteract alternatives to Office on those systems. I think there's nothing but upside for them.
Serious question: If OSS has no patience, resource or manpower, how did all the stuff on a linux distro come into existance (os, utils, window systems, networking, graphics, device drivers) ?
Slashdot Mirror
I couldn't find OSS staples of Java development: Tomcat, Hibernate, Rhino, Spring, Xerces, Xalan, JSON, Jakarta Commons, etc. I wonder by what criteria projects were initially included.
It seems y'all are missing the mark. There are API provisions and bandwidth allotment for app-to-app connectivity. It the applications that are social, not necessarily the developers or users. I'm intrigued.
Why would Mmmm'soft prohibit Office from running on a foreign .NET framework? It is costing them nothing to put it there, they won't have to support it, and it would counteract alternatives to Office on those systems. I think there's nothing but upside for them.
I'm not sure what caused the artifacts in these photos, but it does appear that things have been dicey on previous re-entries.
Serious question: If OSS has no patience, resource or manpower, how did all the stuff on a linux distro come into existance (os, utils, window systems, networking, graphics, device drivers) ?