That's because you've been indoctrinated to trust the scientific establishment.
No, I just find them more reliable when I look into specific issues as a spot check.
Ah, you misunderstood me, I was referring to 'you' in the general, not 'you' in the specific. You in the specific have developed some heuristics for determining what is true beyond what you learned in school, and that separates you from the rabble.
You're going to be disappointed, this isn't ready either: it has two engineers in the front seats making sure things don't go wrong. According to the article, they hope to have that down to one engineer in the near future, and zero engineers.......sometime.
No, they are the consequence of a public that doesn't pay attention. Countries with alternate voting systems still end up with crappy governments (Australia).
Apparently the democrats are too. It's sad that we as a country can't do better than this.
If you start asking people, "which businessperson do you think would make a good president?" they will start listing celebrity CEOs (woohoo! Steve Jobs for president! Nevermind that his temperment is totally unsuited for it).
There aren't many people who think all government is bad (and among those, very few understand history. The federalist papers are a good start for that).
If the public is filled with idiots, they will get the government they deserve.
Exhibit A: I give you Trump vs Clinton. Don't look at the speech issuing forth from the fans of either side and tell me they deserve something different.
Slashdot Mirror
Really? You don't need $200,000?
No, actually.
Looks like the going rate is less than $100k for this kind of exploit. So Google is doing good here.
You mean a government with billions in revenue? The state actors are the ones paying hundreds of thousands of dollars for exploits.
That's because you've been indoctrinated to trust the scientific establishment.
No, I just find them more reliable when I look into specific issues as a spot check.
Ah, you misunderstood me, I was referring to 'you' in the general, not 'you' in the specific. You in the specific have developed some heuristics for determining what is true beyond what you learned in school, and that separates you from the rabble.
You're going to be disappointed, this isn't ready either: it has two engineers in the front seats making sure things don't go wrong. According to the article, they hope to have that down to one engineer in the near future, and zero engineers.......sometime.
If you have a good education, you are less likely to believe climate change is a scientific conspiracy
That's because you've been indoctrinated to trust the scientific establishment.
Yeah, I'm bad at thinking of celebrity CEOs......ok, got it.
Tony Stark for president! Everybody loves Tony. As a bonus he can be a nuclear shield.
Don't they have anything better to do than imitate bad Bond villain plots?.
No, they are the consequence of a public that doesn't pay attention. Countries with alternate voting systems still end up with crappy governments (Australia).
Apparently the democrats are too. It's sad that we as a country can't do better than this.
If you start asking people, "which businessperson do you think would make a good president?" they will start listing celebrity CEOs (woohoo! Steve Jobs for president! Nevermind that his temperment is totally unsuited for it).
Bush is a low bar to judge yourself against.
Snowden's not going to get a pardon because bravery is infectious
It's not really bravery if everyone is doing it, right?
No.
There aren't many people who think all government is bad (and among those, very few understand history. The federalist papers are a good start for that).
Weird to think I probably had a conversation with Snowden and didn't even realize it.
Our constitutional scholar president doesn't feel that the NSA program violates the fourth amendment.
If idiots are making you a victim, maybe you need to look at increasing your competency level.
If the public is filled with idiots, they will get the government they deserve.
Exhibit A: I give you Trump vs Clinton. Don't look at the speech issuing forth from the fans of either side and tell me they deserve something different.
That means the touchscreen screen will have extremely high resolution, otherwise they will lose the fingerprint-unlock.
I hear reception was explosive! More specifically, they annihilated the competition.
Wow, that's convenient.
And once such information makes it to HR - Well, when did your company last send a copy of your tax information to a Nigerian prince who asked nicely?
Does that happen very often?
Nice link! To Europeans, it might sound a lot like this one, or this one.
Facebook is censoring now based on keywords?
To be fair, Instagram is a place to share pictures with people who like to see them, not a place to present new theses on good government.
In other words, it's designed to be a nice warm towel room.
His code is also very nice code.