France has nukes, so Germany would have to start by developing new technology that counters or defends against nukes, so they would feel confident they could win a war. Then, of course, there's always an excuse to start a war.
It's also worth pointing out that terrorist groups will make themselves more and more annoying until they are dealt with. Better to deal with them when the numbers are smaller, rather than waiting until the casualties are significant.
You misread. It's ok, I made the same mistake the first time I read it: it's poorly written.
Look at the times though....both of those phones were charged to ~50% in five minutes. That's some fast charging. (Why didn't they report the time to a total charge? I don't know).
Stanford also developed a kind of fast-charging battery recently, using aluminum-ion cells. This is something a lot of people are researching, so eventually one of the ideas is going to make it into consumer products. It's just a matter of time.
Me, I would say that it was the outside powers, including the US, wanting to end the conflict, if anything because of the collapse of the Soviet Union and no longer having quite the perceived need to prop up a government that itself practiced substantial acts of cruelty and terrorism of its own, which proved to be ineffective. And let's face it, a free and democratic society was hard to argue against. So no, I don't take the contention of the effectiveness of terrorism being an automatic assumption in resolving the civil war in El Salvador.
If the FMLN hadn't continued their campaign, the US wouldn't have needed to 'encourage' the government to make peace.
CTF is not realistic. It's lots of fun, but plenty of "realism" has been cut so you can test skills in realtime. It can take several months to find a zero-day exploit in real life, but in a CTF contest, you might find several of them in a single day.
These are neither water pressure jet packs, nor peroxide jet packs. They look like turbojet jet packs. They claim to have a running time of 30 minutes, and can lift 250 pounds. So you could use them to rescue lighter people, and.......maybe give parachutes to heavier people?
What, am I supposed to give you a full essay, while your own responses are terse and unsubstantiated?
You don't need to write a full essay. You can say things that would be patently obvious to anyone familiar with the situation. The FMLN reached their goals, and one of their commanders is in charge of the country now.
Refugees need a safe place to go, but that doesn't need to be in any European country. Western nations should look to ensure safe camps in countries nearest to the war zones, to minimize the numbers undertaking fatal journeys
Hmm, no, the El Salvador civil war was actually ended by a peace treaty. And given that the terrorism was on both sides, it's hard to say what worked.
It's not hard to say what worked. It's hard for you to say what worked because all you did was read the Wikipedia article on the subject. I could describe the conflict in greater detail, discuss the thousands of pages I've read on the topic and more. We could have an interesting conversation, with both sides bringing interesting facts to the conversation.
But what's the point? You'll just try to argue about it. What interesting facts can you bring about the El Salvador civil war? I'm here to have interesting conversations and learn, not to argue.
See? Strategy and tactics definitely were involved in the invasion of Poland (and France, for that matter)!
the Germans came stomping through the Ardennes (only headed towards Antwerp this time) and surprised the Americans with something known as the Battle of the Bulge.
In that case it caught them by surprise because it was a foolish move lol. The Germans didn't have the forces necessary to seize initiative while also defending, and indeed, the allies were quick to punish them for their over-extension.
bet, when Germany starts WWIII, they do so with stomping north and then heading east, again.
My point is that you can't judge a group of people based on what they did five hundred years ago. Your own point explained why: because groups of people can change.
In your original post, you were trying to say that, "Muslims were bad then, therefore muslims are bad now." That is a stupid thing to say. If you want to say that they are bad now (and some of them are), then explain that. Don't bring irrelevant history into it, thinking it bolsters your point. It doesn't bolster your point for reasons already mentioned.
They provided a 'fair' trial, and had at least some systems of law in place.
Indeed, it was fair. For example, anything you said while you were tortured had to be affirmed again after the torture was over, otherwise it was considered invalid. Of course, that might mean you would get more torture, but details!
That's like asking why the Nazis chose to invade Poland when they did,
There was a lot of strategy involved. If they had invaded too early, for example, they risked being stopped by the allies of WW1.
When the goal is total subjugation of all targets, the rationale for which targets are selected first is sort of irrelevant.
It's definitely not irrelevant. If Germany had hit France before they had sufficient force to win, they wouldn't have pushed Britain out of the continent. Moves must be made after they are prepared.
Slashdot Mirror
So giving up terrorism worked for both of them.
Certainly, knowing when to stop using a tactic is important as well.
France has nukes, so Germany would have to start by developing new technology that counters or defends against nukes, so they would feel confident they could win a war. Then, of course, there's always an excuse to start a war.
Nah, RS was mainly trying to sell issues by being sensationalist.
Good example.
I'm sure Turkey would be willing to take money to build more refugee camps.....scraping some of the money off the top.
It takes 2 or more drivers driving poorly to have a crash
Yes, that has been my observation as well. It is amazing how robust the traffic system is, considering how faulty the people are who make it up.
Continuously and everywhere.
You probably wanted the word "continually" here.
It's also worth pointing out that terrorist groups will make themselves more and more annoying until they are dealt with. Better to deal with them when the numbers are smaller, rather than waiting until the casualties are significant.
The meaning you just explained was clear on a first pass reading.
I'm so glad you're such an intelligent reader.
You misread. It's ok, I made the same mistake the first time I read it: it's poorly written.
Look at the times though....both of those phones were charged to ~50% in five minutes. That's some fast charging. (Why didn't they report the time to a total charge? I don't know).
Stanford also developed a kind of fast-charging battery recently, using aluminum-ion cells. This is something a lot of people are researching, so eventually one of the ideas is going to make it into consumer products. It's just a matter of time.
Me, I would say that it was the outside powers, including the US, wanting to end the conflict, if anything because of the collapse of the Soviet Union and no longer having quite the perceived need to prop up a government that itself practiced substantial acts of cruelty and terrorism of its own, which proved to be ineffective. And let's face it, a free and democratic society was hard to argue against. So no, I don't take the contention of the effectiveness of terrorism being an automatic assumption in resolving the civil war in El Salvador.
If the FMLN hadn't continued their campaign, the US wouldn't have needed to 'encourage' the government to make peace.
You want realistic games?
CTF is not realistic. It's lots of fun, but plenty of "realism" has been cut so you can test skills in realtime. It can take several months to find a zero-day exploit in real life, but in a CTF contest, you might find several of them in a single day.
There is not a single place in the U.S. that requires that income.
Atherton.
These are neither water pressure jet packs, nor peroxide jet packs. They look like turbojet jet packs. They claim to have a running time of 30 minutes, and can lift 250 pounds. So you could use them to rescue lighter people, and.......maybe give parachutes to heavier people?
What, am I supposed to give you a full essay, while your own responses are terse and unsubstantiated?
You don't need to write a full essay. You can say things that would be patently obvious to anyone familiar with the situation. The FMLN reached their goals, and one of their commanders is in charge of the country now.
Refugees need a safe place to go, but that doesn't need to be in any European country. Western nations should look to ensure safe camps in countries nearest to the war zones, to minimize the numbers undertaking fatal journeys
Those are interesting points.
Nobody is defending the people who perpetrated these attacks.
Look at this. Who were they blaming for the bombing? Not the person who did it.
Hmm, no, the El Salvador civil war was actually ended by a peace treaty. And given that the terrorism was on both sides, it's hard to say what worked.
It's not hard to say what worked. It's hard for you to say what worked because all you did was read the Wikipedia article on the subject. I could describe the conflict in greater detail, discuss the thousands of pages I've read on the topic and more. We could have an interesting conversation, with both sides bringing interesting facts to the conversation.
But what's the point? You'll just try to argue about it. What interesting facts can you bring about the El Salvador civil war? I'm here to have interesting conversations and learn, not to argue.
the Germans came stomping through the Ardennes (only headed towards Antwerp this time) and surprised the Americans with something known as the Battle of the Bulge.
In that case it caught them by surprise because it was a foolish move lol. The Germans didn't have the forces necessary to seize initiative while also defending, and indeed, the allies were quick to punish them for their over-extension.
bet, when Germany starts WWIII, they do so with stomping north and then heading east, again.
O_O
You fail to understand Islam.
No I don't. There are plenty of Muslims who embrace modernity.
My point is that you can't judge a group of people based on what they did five hundred years ago. Your own point explained why: because groups of people can change.
In your original post, you were trying to say that, "Muslims were bad then, therefore muslims are bad now." That is a stupid thing to say. If you want to say that they are bad now (and some of them are), then explain that. Don't bring irrelevant history into it, thinking it bolsters your point. It doesn't bolster your point for reasons already mentioned.
That is an indication that maybe you should change, focus on the major points instead of nitpicking little details
Well that's your mistake. The Catholics certainly aren't acting like they were 500 years ago.
Your second sentence there supports my point. I wonder if you can see that.
Well, I can't say I find your reaction to be astonishing myself. Rather the opposite. It's rather expected and predictable.
Yes. I'll bet you'll find people often have that opinion of you lol
They provided a 'fair' trial, and had at least some systems of law in place.
Indeed, it was fair. For example, anything you said while you were tortured had to be affirmed again after the torture was over, otherwise it was considered invalid. Of course, that might mean you would get more torture, but details!
That's like asking why the Nazis chose to invade Poland when they did,
There was a lot of strategy involved. If they had invaded too early, for example, they risked being stopped by the allies of WW1.
When the goal is total subjugation of all targets, the rationale for which targets are selected first is sort of irrelevant.
It's definitely not irrelevant. If Germany had hit France before they had sufficient force to win, they wouldn't have pushed Britain out of the continent. Moves must be made after they are prepared.