If you see bubbles everywhere, then you might want to recalibrate your vision. It's true there are a lot of useless startups (as always), but the difference between now and 1997 is revenue. It's not just a black hole that money goes into, there is money coming back out.
Good point that the cost of getting started is much lower now, though.
I regret that I didn't mine bitcoin back in 2010, and I regret that I didn't have the foresight to do an ICO last year. Oh well, I guess there are better ways to make money than fraud.
Hard to make any reasonable comment on a UK case, because I don't know the laws there. The article doesn't help because their explanations are just confusing. All I can say is be careful what you put online, but everyone here knows that.
On the other hand that shitty code I wrote in 2003 which has since been debugged to the point of being rock solid
Oh yeah, that reminds me of another unusual benefit of C++: it is a stable platform. You would have thought by now that wouldn't be unusual, but turns out it is.
Blockchain is useful as a database when you don't trust anyone to keep the database, and it's ok if the information is public (so even though I don't trust my bank with my social security number, they still have it).
There are not very many use cases where that is applicable.
No, that's exactly why a public system works better - they're your patients whether you like it or not, always and forever
OK, let's see your specific proposal.
The primary reason the US needs to spend twice as much to have the same level of healthcare is that everyone is trying to cherry pick profitable patients and get rid of unprofitable patients, with hospitals billing for things you don't really need while insurance companies work to avoid paying claims
Oh, I see you haven't actually looked at data: you're just guessing and wishing.
After having a nice sleep, I remembered several programs written in C++ that I've seen that are really quite well written. The language still annoys me, but I respect it.
It's amazing how far Marx managed to reach. The most influential philosopher of the 19th century, for sure. The field of archeology only recently managed to overcome his influence and come up with something more sane.
That's why I think the arguments about "public" or "private" are rather silly...... It's better to evaluate individual proposals to see what is better. Some people think "single payer" is magic that will make everything, better, but it's not. Some people think the free market is magic that will make everything better, but it's not. Clearly we need regulation, but what type of regulation exactly? Each regulation needs to be evaluated on its own merits (and good luck with your health problems).
I used to wonder about this kind of phenomenon, which is present in all language communities. Of course code written for a library should be different than other code, it has different requirements.
I realized a lot of people learn their programming skill from looking at library APIs, because that's the only other code they look at. The way to learn programming is by looking at other code, and they only look at the code of APIs.
If anyone read the summary and is wondering why Slack is mentioned as an authority here, Slack is the last name of one of the doctors involved, not a crappy IRC replacement.
Yeah, all the different type systems. Those are cool, I admit, but they're mainly aimed at code correctness rather than code organization. Btw.I have no problem getting rid of dynamic linking, at this point even in the worst case of the program being an extra G or two to download, no one is going to notice.
Slashdot Mirror
; if you change too much and make it too unrecognizable it's harder to make your point.
Like talking to lions.
Photos are more realistic.
If you see bubbles everywhere, then you might want to recalibrate your vision. It's true there are a lot of useless startups (as always), but the difference between now and 1997 is revenue. It's not just a black hole that money goes into, there is money coming back out.
Good point that the cost of getting started is much lower now, though.
I regret that I didn't mine bitcoin back in 2010, and I regret that I didn't have the foresight to do an ICO last year. Oh well, I guess there are better ways to make money than fraud.
Tbh I don't understand why Americans buy them. When I've seen them in use, the use cases are narrow and the implementation frustrating.
Hard to make any reasonable comment on a UK case, because I don't know the laws there. The article doesn't help because their explanations are just confusing. All I can say is be careful what you put online, but everyone here knows that.
Yeah that kind of speech is usually my sign to look for a new job.
ok, let's see if you are irrational or not, as well.
Can you name any way the US system is better than Canada's?
On the other hand that shitty code I wrote in 2003 which has since been debugged to the point of being rock solid
Oh yeah, that reminds me of another unusual benefit of C++: it is a stable platform. You would have thought by now that wouldn't be unusual, but turns out it is.
Blockchain is useful as a database when you don't trust anyone to keep the database, and it's ok if the information is public (so even though I don't trust my bank with my social security number, they still have it).
There are not very many use cases where that is applicable.
My proposal for health care would give the greatest flexibility to the greatest number of people
I'm not entirely sure what you mean here. How would you make it more flexible?
No, that's exactly why a public system works better - they're your patients whether you like it or not, always and forever
OK, let's see your specific proposal.
The primary reason the US needs to spend twice as much to have the same level of healthcare is that everyone is trying to cherry pick profitable patients and get rid of unprofitable patients, with hospitals billing for things you don't really need while insurance companies work to avoid paying claims
Oh, I see you haven't actually looked at data: you're just guessing and wishing.
After having a nice sleep, I remembered several programs written in C++ that I've seen that are really quite well written. The language still annoys me, but I respect it.
Or click on ads and don't buy anything. There is that option. And no, it's not click fraud.
Huh. I always wondered what happened to Microsoft Flight Sim. That was a good sim.
It's amazing how far Marx managed to reach. The most influential philosopher of the 19th century, for sure. The field of archeology only recently managed to overcome his influence and come up with something more sane.
I think most managers lack that ability.
That's why I think the arguments about "public" or "private" are rather silly...... It's better to evaluate individual proposals to see what is better. Some people think "single payer" is magic that will make everything, better, but it's not. Some people think the free market is magic that will make everything better, but it's not. Clearly we need regulation, but what type of regulation exactly? Each regulation needs to be evaluated on its own merits (and good luck with your health problems).
I used to wonder about this kind of phenomenon, which is present in all language communities. Of course code written for a library should be different than other code, it has different requirements.
I realized a lot of people learn their programming skill from looking at library APIs, because that's the only other code they look at. The way to learn programming is by looking at other code, and they only look at the code of APIs.
Pretty near every language allows polymorphism these days.
If anyone read the summary and is wondering why Slack is mentioned as an authority here, Slack is the last name of one of the doctors involved, not a crappy IRC replacement.
Really? Like what?
It's not C compatible anymore.
Or just choose a different language. That's probably reasonable.
Yeah, all the different type systems. Those are cool, I admit, but they're mainly aimed at code correctness rather than code organization. Btw.I have no problem getting rid of dynamic linking, at this point even in the worst case of the program being an extra G or two to download, no one is going to notice.