It's a good effort, but you can't bolt security on as an afterthought. It needs to be built into the core of the system, and every programmer needs to have it in mind, because any programmer can write a security hole.
That's an interesting observation and it has me thinking.
Now you're thinking, I like it:)
If you can get a stock that gives you 10% dividends (and isn't doing some kind of weird trick) then of course, take it. The total amount of money in the world is going to equal the total amount of goods, though. If the amount of money increases without the amount of goods increasing, then you will see inflation, and each 'piece' of money will decrease in value.
Another important distinction to consider: some things are capital goods, others are consumption goods. Buying a chicken will give you a steady stream of income (dividends), but if you want to increase the value of your stock, you need to buy another chicken. Or a factory, or hire more people. (of course you can save some eggs for a while, but most consumable goods get used up surprisingly quickly. We need a constant stream of production to maintain value).
So you can broadly draw the outlines of the economy by looking at the total number of capital goods purchased (factories, chickens, etc) and total number of consumables purchased.
Oh yeah? What company are you working for that doesn't have a manager? If your team decides to goof off, and not do any work for a few months, what will happen?
Re: "it has too many youtube videos"
There are two
Yes, that is too many.
and you apparently didn't go through all of the materials.
I barely have time to read the summary, clicking through a maze of links is too much trouble. I clicked around for a while but didn't see much good. Isn't there a single page that summarizes it all?
Realize that for each of these types of petroglyphs, they all have a view of the south magnetic pole.
Really? Is that true? Tucson Arizona has a view of the south magnetic pole?
Seriously though, the formatting of the submission is very poor, that's the #1 reason it didn't get accepted.
I used to think you were right, but with the IoT, there are a lot of devices that do reset when they reboot, cleaning out any viruses that have infected. It turns out it doesn't matter, viruses like Mirai just re-infect the system after a reboot.
The ultimate point is that these companies don't care about security. Your idea would improve security, but it will never be implemented by companies who leave telnet open with admin/admin login. It will never be implemented by Intel, who doesn't even have decent code review on their UEFI code. Maybe most importantly, customers are happy to buy devices that have an open telnet port.
Seriously, we've known not to use telnet for over two decades, and we've known to use good passwords for at least four decades. No one cares.
The submission has so many links, it's not clear what the main link is. So clean that up. Secondly, it has too many youtube videos. No one has time for that, find a text version (again, see the first sentence). Youtube video links don't make it to the front page very often. Third, get rid of the link to the comedian.
Finally, and most importantly, looking through the links, the hypothesis is interesting, certainly prehistoric man looked at and recorded the stars, but I don't see the rock solid evidence. Where are the pictures of petroglyphs compared to the High-Current, Z-Pinch Aurora? I'll be honest, I don't even know what a High-Current, Z-Pinch Aurora looks like. So it's hard to really evaluate the hypothesis.
Finally, as an alternative hypothesis, some of these petroglyphs are still being made by native tribes from around the world, so we do know what a lot of them mean.
The risk and volatility is much lower - you can almost guarantee you won't make much more than 10% or much less than 9%, over the long term
I want to point out that in the long term, the stock market will not grow much faster than the economy as a whole. It has recently because new people have been investing more and more in the market, pushing more money into the system, pushing up prices, but long term that won't last. (This doesn't mean the process will reverse, although it could).
I don't know when exactly this will change, but it's good to remember as a general rule, in the long term the stock market can't exceed the gains of the general economy because eventually money will run out.
No True Scottsman, eh? Let me explain to you how you got it exactly backwards:
In practice this means you stick with a process, unless it means it stands in the way of progress and / or interaction between people.
First you have to focus on individuals and people. Then if needed, you build processes to support them. The entire focus is on the people, not on the process. If a process doesn't do that, you dump it.
A process isn't inherently evil, see also: the scrum process
Don't think of it in terms of evil. A process inherently has a cost, and so does Scrum. If for some reason you insist on using Scrum, there is one way to do it right: and that is to use it as a tool to increase the skill and independence of the developers. If you're not doing that, you're doing it wrong.
If I were designing it, the init system and the hot swapping system would completely separate, but the init system would call into the hot swapping system through a minimal interface when needed. That would give you maximal flexibility.
Perhaps you have an alternative explanation, if so I would like to hear it.
Yeah, I do, I discussed it at length in my journal, with this particular entry being the core. Lennart Poettering spent a lot of time working with distro builders and figuring out what would make things easier for them. So that one use case it does well, and I commend it for that.
And I would say there are other use cases it does well, but that is the most important one. Why am I against it? Again I discussed it at length, but the short answer I will restate from above: when pieces of the system become too entwined, that's bad architecture.
Slashdot Mirror
Great! If you have any other disputes with what I've written, let me know. Next time I won't accuse you of a no true Scottsman fallacy.
NO viable player on the US espouses anything like an actual leftist agenda,
Because no viable player in the world espouses anything like an actual leftist agenda?
No, they have the easiest job in the world: attacking Windows It's the blue team with the stressful job.
The only way North Korea will rejoin with the south is if Kim Jong-un is allowed to rule it
How on earth could you possibly know that?
tbh I'd really like to spend some time getting Enlightenment Desktop working nicely, because I think it has a lot of potential. Next year, maybe.
Microsoft's solution to insecure code was to graft on a layer of insecure security code.
That's right.
It's a good effort, but you can't bolt security on as an afterthought. It needs to be built into the core of the system, and every programmer needs to have it in mind, because any programmer can write a security hole.
That's an interesting observation and it has me thinking.
Now you're thinking, I like it :)
If you can get a stock that gives you 10% dividends (and isn't doing some kind of weird trick) then of course, take it. The total amount of money in the world is going to equal the total amount of goods, though. If the amount of money increases without the amount of goods increasing, then you will see inflation, and each 'piece' of money will decrease in value.
Another important distinction to consider: some things are capital goods, others are consumption goods. Buying a chicken will give you a steady stream of income (dividends), but if you want to increase the value of your stock, you need to buy another chicken. Or a factory, or hire more people. (of course you can save some eggs for a while, but most consumable goods get used up surprisingly quickly. We need a constant stream of production to maintain value).
So you can broadly draw the outlines of the economy by looking at the total number of capital goods purchased (factories, chickens, etc) and total number of consumables purchased.
ok, so you do have a manager. Glad we clarified.
Oh yeah? What company are you working for that doesn't have a manager? If your team decides to goof off, and not do any work for a few months, what will happen?
He wants his 18th century security ideas back.
Hey, King George was on the phone, he had some ideas about stamp taxes, too. You might like those. Are you interested, Mr Security Minister?
Re: "it has too many youtube videos" There are two
Yes, that is too many.
and you apparently didn't go through all of the materials.
I barely have time to read the summary, clicking through a maze of links is too much trouble. I clicked around for a while but didn't see much good. Isn't there a single page that summarizes it all?
Realize that for each of these types of petroglyphs, they all have a view of the south magnetic pole.
Really? Is that true? Tucson Arizona has a view of the south magnetic pole?
Seriously though, the formatting of the submission is very poor, that's the #1 reason it didn't get accepted.
btw, I should add that Kaspersky OS comes close to what you describe, in addition it only allows white-listed software to be run.
I used to think you were right, but with the IoT, there are a lot of devices that do reset when they reboot, cleaning out any viruses that have infected. It turns out it doesn't matter, viruses like Mirai just re-infect the system after a reboot.
In addition, UEFI is so big and poorly thought out that persistence becomes possible, even below the OS level.
The ultimate point is that these companies don't care about security. Your idea would improve security, but it will never be implemented by companies who leave telnet open with admin/admin login. It will never be implemented by Intel, who doesn't even have decent code review on their UEFI code. Maybe most importantly, customers are happy to buy devices that have an open telnet port.
Seriously, we've known not to use telnet for over two decades, and we've known to use good passwords for at least four decades. No one cares.
The submission has so many links, it's not clear what the main link is. So clean that up. Secondly, it has too many youtube videos. No one has time for that, find a text version (again, see the first sentence). Youtube video links don't make it to the front page very often. Third, get rid of the link to the comedian.
Finally, and most importantly, looking through the links, the hypothesis is interesting, certainly prehistoric man looked at and recorded the stars, but I don't see the rock solid evidence. Where are the pictures of petroglyphs compared to the High-Current, Z-Pinch Aurora? I'll be honest, I don't even know what a High-Current, Z-Pinch Aurora looks like. So it's hard to really evaluate the hypothesis.
Finally, as an alternative hypothesis, some of these petroglyphs are still being made by native tribes from around the world, so we do know what a lot of them mean.
Trump is probably the ONLY president who can pull this off.
Clinton was really good at this kind of thing too, the work he did in the Balkans was really impressive.
The risk and volatility is much lower - you can almost guarantee you won't make much more than 10% or much less than 9%, over the long term
I want to point out that in the long term, the stock market will not grow much faster than the economy as a whole. It has recently because new people have been investing more and more in the market, pushing more money into the system, pushing up prices, but long term that won't last. (This doesn't mean the process will reverse, although it could).
I don't know when exactly this will change, but it's good to remember as a general rule, in the long term the stock market can't exceed the gains of the general economy because eventually money will run out.
All processes will morph into something less than acceptable and assured over time.
That's an interesting point.
And you yourself fall for the faux agile
No True Scottsman, eh? Let me explain to you how you got it exactly backwards:
In practice this means you stick with a process, unless it means it stands in the way of progress and / or interaction between people.
First you have to focus on individuals and people. Then if needed, you build processes to support them. The entire focus is on the people, not on the process. If a process doesn't do that, you dump it.
A process isn't inherently evil, see also: the scrum process
Don't think of it in terms of evil. A process inherently has a cost, and so does Scrum. If for some reason you insist on using Scrum, there is one way to do it right: and that is to use it as a tool to increase the skill and independence of the developers. If you're not doing that, you're doing it wrong.
I guess you got Scrum wrong. In Scrum, there is basically no manager
You still have a manager.
The Unix philosophy is not "each piece does one thing." It's complex and you should understand it.
If I were designing it, the init system and the hot swapping system would completely separate, but the init system would call into the hot swapping system through a minimal interface when needed. That would give you maximal flexibility.
I'm glad :)
As far as I'm concerned, scrum can fall into a river. Standups suck.
Perhaps you have an alternative explanation, if so I would like to hear it.
Yeah, I do, I discussed it at length in my journal, with this particular entry being the core. Lennart Poettering spent a lot of time working with distro builders and figuring out what would make things easier for them. So that one use case it does well, and I commend it for that.
And I would say there are other use cases it does well, but that is the most important one. Why am I against it? Again I discussed it at length, but the short answer I will restate from above: when pieces of the system become too entwined, that's bad architecture.
ls -lh /lib/systemd/systemd /lib/systemd/systemd
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1.6M Feb 1 23:31
It's clearly not a lithe, slender little thing running as pid 1.