Fuck the constitiution. Regardless of any law, he did the right thing. I'm Fing sick of people holding up a document written by slaveholders as if its the moral standard upon which we should base all of our behaviors.
But how well does it support IpV6. I made a quick purchase of dsl modem recently that had a nice IPV6 sticker on it, It does support it, but its a pain in the but to set up and their are bugs everywhere.
Yeah, I mistyped, I meant what you said. 6to4 but the other way around. Most of the valuable Internet resources are dual stack IPv4 and V6. As otther large companies enable Ipv6 the temptation to not have v4 increases. In short, you don't want to be the first company to migrate ( no real reason to), but you don't want to be the last one to (you'll lose customers).
I wouldn't be surprised if the next twitter/facebook/tumblr 10 years from now does ipv6 only. I should do an expirament with IpV6 only to see how useful it is.
Theoretically, you could lose some business in the future if you don't support ipv6 and the customer doesn't have access to a 6to4 tunnel. It still seems like a long way off before that's an issue.
Its marginal, to be sure, right now. There *can* be some websites that are IPv6 only that you won't be able to access if you only have ipv4. As far as I know there aren't any that are worth while visiting. Also, If large websites support IPv6 in addition to v4, if on eis down you should be able to access the other if they are on different servers. So you might have more uptime?
There are other things that Ipv6 is good at that probably wouldn't matter to most home users. Like having mutliple machines externally accessible on the same port.
I could also refurb things if I could get Kinkos to print out the part I needed. As time goes on, they'd updat their printer to compete with staples so the next time I need something it will be printed to even higher tolerances at the same price. I'd be stupid to buy, if this was the case.
That's a good point. I should sell my Metal and wood working tools capabile of building durable long lasting weapons, and buy a printer capable of building crappy plastic ones. The future is Plastic
You're crazy. How often does the average person have a true need for a 3d printed object? Rarely, I would say. So the while the cost isn't in and of itself an issue, the benefit to owning a printer is low. Why shouldn't staples, kinkos, and others just allow you to print your object on a one off basis? If there is money to be made, that's where it is.
I don't want to watch *any* Schwarzenegger movies. But I don't understand the full implication. Yes, he used steroids, obviously. Are you thinking that I didn't know this, or that his muscles are more obvious than McGuire or Sosa's? Or what? Or I'd reflect on how California could elect him as Governor and despair?
Ha! I used to work at a place with a real honest to god genius. Who was almost irreplaceable and by far the primary engine behind the company's growth. He also hated, hated any and all attempts to restrict his access to anything that interested him. We went through several network administrators that thought they were smarter and didn't want him to sporadically take down the network when one of his side projects unrelated to work brought down the network. I felt bad for the poor bastards that were in that no win situation.
It isn't very accurate in cases like itunes where most of the access of the content is done not through a stand alone application, rather than a general purpose web browser. It ranks pages based on (amoung other things) their popularity on the web, which may well be different than their popularity through some other access method.
My first professional job was in perl. And I knew how to write readable perl, so I did. And the lead dev marked the hell out of it, and required that I re write it in the cannonical unreadable form. I think with the true perl beleivers, the more illegibile the code is, the better it is. ( well not really, but their is a zen of perl, which gave rise to the perl monks. And that zen is almost indistinguishable from garbage.)
The point that is being discussed here, is that it takes a lot longer to understand the particular actions with perl than most other programing languages. The general purpose of what comments should be used for is a different discussion.
part of the confusion, is that most people heard of php before cake, code igniter or zend. Most people learned of ruby through Ruby on Rails and just assumed it was a language. Rather than a language and a third party framework.
Such a terrible, terrible argument. There is a difference between what I as an individual should do to maximise my survival, and what a mythical diety in the sky should do to promote "fairness". I as an indivdual should look to minimize risk. Absolutely no one who was using liberty mutal ( edxcept the criminals) was minimizing thier risk. They really do have only themselves to blame for putting themselves in that sitaution. It was very clear for a very long time that liberty reserve was not following the law, and that the US government was intent on cracking down on those very laws.
This is only idiots trust their money to a corporation that doesn't follow the laws. It will attract criminals, and eventually they'll end up without their money.
They do apply to sending a code via text message that needs to be input to complete authentication... Which is exactly how twitter is doing it. I wouldn't be surprised if there is prior art.
I don't get the reference... I don't think anyone who really appreciates coffee prefers pod coffee. I was drinking a cup of it as I wrote that, so I'm not trying to be condescending. Its not bad, just not great. Much, much better than when we had a traditional drip coffee machine that nobody every cleaned.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OS/2 was pretty decent. as was a Mac. Or Amiga. They all had decent software stacks. Microsoft did the best job selling to businesses as well as consumers. But when there was competition, I often chose non Microsoft stuff.
Also, You were not using outlook in 1993. It didn't exist back then. The first versions came out around 96 or so. It was only bundled with the rest of office in Office 97, before that it came with MS Exchange.
Fuck the constitiution. Regardless of any law, he did the right thing. I'm Fing sick of people holding up a document written by slaveholders as if its the moral standard upon which we should base all of our behaviors.
But how well does it support IpV6. I made a quick purchase of dsl modem recently that had a nice IPV6 sticker on it, It does support it, but its a pain in the but to set up and their are bugs everywhere.
Yeah, I mistyped, I meant what you said. 6to4 but the other way around. Most of the valuable Internet resources are dual stack IPv4 and V6. As otther large companies enable Ipv6 the temptation to not have v4 increases. In short, you don't want to be the first company to migrate ( no real reason to), but you don't want to be the last one to (you'll lose customers).
I wouldn't be surprised if the next twitter/facebook/tumblr 10 years from now does ipv6 only. I should do an expirament with IpV6 only to see how useful it is.
No, not all Cable modems and DSL Modems have supported ipv6. There are also several that are insanely difficult to set up, and bugs are everywhere.
Theoretically, you could lose some business in the future if you don't support ipv6 and the customer doesn't have access to a 6to4 tunnel. It still seems like a long way off before that's an issue.
Its marginal, to be sure, right now. There *can* be some websites that are IPv6 only that you won't be able to access if you only have ipv4. As far as I know there aren't any that are worth while visiting. Also, If large websites support IPv6 in addition to v4, if on eis down you should be able to access the other if they are on different servers. So you might have more uptime?
There are other things that Ipv6 is good at that probably wouldn't matter to most home users. Like having mutliple machines externally accessible on the same port.
I could also refurb things if I could get Kinkos to print out the part I needed. As time goes on, they'd updat their printer to compete with staples so the next time I need something it will be printed to even higher tolerances at the same price. I'd be stupid to buy, if this was the case.
That's a good point. I should sell my Metal and wood working tools capabile of building durable long lasting weapons, and buy a printer capable of building crappy plastic ones. The future is Plastic
You're crazy. How often does the average person have a true need for a 3d printed object? Rarely, I would say. So the while the cost isn't in and of itself an issue, the benefit to owning a printer is low. Why shouldn't staples, kinkos, and others just allow you to print your object on a one off basis? If there is money to be made, that's where it is.
I don't want to watch *any* Schwarzenegger movies. But I don't understand the full implication. Yes, he used steroids, obviously. Are you thinking that I didn't know this, or that his muscles are more obvious than McGuire or Sosa's? Or what? Or I'd reflect on how California could elect him as Governor and despair?
They weren't given the budget to do that, and that would have just caused him to link the two together in an unorthodox fashion and kill both anyway.
You and me both. It was pretty obvious, if you didn't hail from St Louis. Sosa too...
Ha! I used to work at a place with a real honest to god genius. Who was almost irreplaceable and by far the primary engine behind the company's growth. He also hated, hated any and all attempts to restrict his access to anything that interested him. We went through several network administrators that thought they were smarter and didn't want him to sporadically take down the network when one of his side projects unrelated to work brought down the network. I felt bad for the poor bastards that were in that no win situation.
It isn't very accurate in cases like itunes where most of the access of the content is done not through a stand alone application, rather than a general purpose web browser. It ranks pages based on (amoung other things) their popularity on the web, which may well be different than their popularity through some other access method.
My first professional job was in perl. And I knew how to write readable perl, so I did. And the lead dev marked the hell out of it, and required that I re write it in the cannonical unreadable form. I think with the true perl beleivers, the more illegibile the code is, the better it is. ( well not really, but their is a zen of perl, which gave rise to the perl monks. And that zen is almost indistinguishable from garbage.)
The point that is being discussed here, is that it takes a lot longer to understand the particular actions with perl than most other programing languages. The general purpose of what comments should be used for is a different discussion.
part of the confusion, is that most people heard of php before cake, code igniter or zend. Most people learned of ruby through Ruby on Rails and just assumed it was a language. Rather than a language and a third party framework.
Such a terrible, terrible argument. There is a difference between what I as an individual should do to maximise my survival, and what a mythical diety in the sky should do to promote "fairness". I as an indivdual should look to minimize risk. Absolutely no one who was using liberty mutal ( edxcept the criminals) was minimizing thier risk. They really do have only themselves to blame for putting themselves in that sitaution. It was very clear for a very long time that liberty reserve was not following the law, and that the US government was intent on cracking down on those very laws.
This is only idiots trust their money to a corporation that doesn't follow the laws. It will attract criminals, and eventually they'll end up without their money.
So Can I....
http://www.redhat.com/solutions/industry/government/certifications.html
They do apply to sending a code via text message that needs to be input to complete authentication... Which is exactly how twitter is doing it. I wouldn't be surprised if there is prior art.
In my case, it would be PC LOAD LARD...
Need to go on a diet...
I don't get the reference... I don't think anyone who really appreciates coffee prefers pod coffee. I was drinking a cup of it as I wrote that, so I'm not trying to be condescending. Its not bad, just not great. Much, much better than when we had a traditional drip coffee machine that nobody every cleaned.
Better tasting my foot. Its not bad, but its not the best coffee I've ever had.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OS/2 was pretty decent. as was a Mac. Or Amiga. They all had decent software stacks. Microsoft did the best job selling to businesses as well as consumers. But when there was competition, I often chose non Microsoft stuff.
Also, You were not using outlook in 1993. It didn't exist back then. The first versions came out around 96 or so. It was only bundled with the rest of office in Office 97, before that it came with MS Exchange.