SQL Express is not the same. Its like suggesting a Smart car is a good substitute for a F1 Race car. Yes, they may have a simular manufactorer and interface, but come on.
So sad, that this isn't the first non-troll post. Its the most obvious first place to start. There are more specifics that can be delved into, but if you aren't starting with their guidelines, eck!
Personal attack aside, I think I understand your first point. He provided reasons why you would call someone a label, by also applying that label to the policies. Forgive me, If I don't like the circular nature of that line of reasoning.
Second, I don't hink you read all of my post. There are policies like the individual mandate that were considered "conservative" a few years ago. The term is ill defined as its pretty much used to simply describe policies and people that they don't like without having to describe why. And that's what bugs the ever loving crap out of me. Why is the only thing that is important. Not the labels. Using ill defined labels for decision making, results in poor decisions.
I think you just proved mine. Rather than having a legitimate debate about the roles of government, republicans are keen to just to point something they don't like and say " that's liberal". The world is not quite so binary. Some ideas sucha s the individual mandate, I assume you are obliquely refering to, were strongly suported and even proposed by those that would then and even now call themselves "conservative".
Do you mean: "big"==" well known companies who use godaddy" Or "big"==" companies that have a large number of domanis and related services from godaddy" ?
Because there are people/companies with thousands of domains, which they could pull from godaddy and make a noticible dent in their profits instantly by making the switch, but they wouldn't inspire anyone else to do the same.
However wikimedia, may only have a few domains and services, but inspire others to do the same.
Neither one, but both: we are all users and people that are used. Didn't you listen to pop music in the eighties? Sweet Dreams ring a bell? How about an image of Marlyon Manson riding a pig while wearing a tutu? Anything?
To synergize our leveragables into a new cloud based paradygmn, we'll need a new solutions oriented IT team to create some actionables to create a win-win in reducing internal friction and increase efficiencies to enable the monitization of our empowered workforce.
I agree, because the state of the art isn't fool proof yet. Until everyone on the street can encrypt and decrypt messages safely and securely, you'll have to know how it works.
On a side note, Cell phones might be a good example of a mature encryption system, except its not end to end or very secure. But people don't have to know about GSM encryption or keys or anything else. They are just protected in the transmission of their call from their handset to the carrier. Of course the encryption's been broken for a while, and government agencies just tap into the carrier itself to listen. But secure decryption should be so pervasive and easy to use that it requires nothing of the end user.
But uhm... don't bomb the sears tower. Its mostly empty. Leave it as an example of America's failed economic system. Sears Roebuck built it as a head quarters based on predictions of growth that proved to be unrealistic. Eventually the moved out to the burbs and built a new complex that they are considering abandoning to go back to the city, where they would build a different building for their headquarters.
Ignore the other losers that responded "I don't care about it". The whole point is there may be others that would find cyrptogrophy to be "boring" or "Not interesting".
I, on the other hand, am actively trying to learn everything about baseball, my car's engine, and pro wrestling. They are interesting, everything is. Unfortunately that kinda limits my time for investigating them, so I don't know everything about them, but research them when I am presented an opportunity to. I know a lo about cryptography because the tools are still immature, requiring a bit more understanding of how they work. Like cars were in 1905.
Well, The whole idea was to get large groups of people to switch from their pagan religion to the Christian. Greatest, easiest way to do that? Gradually. By co-opting the date and some of the existing traditions the new religion goes down easier. Soon, people aren't worshipping mother earth, but Jesus Christ. And isn't that the whole idea if you want to spread Christianity? Even furthermore, If there is only one God, the father, son, and holy spirit, then all religions share a portion of truth as they worship the God that they know. So their traditions also share an element of truth in them.
So its kinda funny to hear people ( usually Jahovah's witnesses) say Oh that's not christian its pagan! Well, duh. We did that on purpose.
What is geek paraphernalia? 1980's posters telling you that "Computers don't Byte?" Or a road sign that says " this way to the information super highway!". Ugh, eck. Wrong.
Do it like it was done unto me.
Put some vim posters, and maybe sections of kernel.h printed on ye old'e green and white.
And make the room dark and foreboding. Loop 1980's new wave bands intermixed with psychedelic 60/70's. No natural light, sections of light banks that can be independently turned on and off as to provide just enough light to make out each other and the obstacles around you. Bonus points if more than one tube flickers and sends sparks intermittently.
Develop some rituals for the students, some incantations to the mighty computers. Sell copious amounts of energy drinks and high sugar snacks on the down low to your students to buy better equipment than the school board provides and give them super human coding skills.
The same could be argued against cutting Public Radio or the national endowment of the arts funding. Every cut you make will be a drop in the bucket. Every tax raised may also be a drop in the bucket. But, but collecting those drops into a bucket, it gets filled up.
There isn't a good argument to not raise taxes on the higher income brackets. Just hand waving and mumbling about "job creators".
Is it too much to really ask for compromise? Some Tax raises and some cuts?
Exactly. Software is one part of the puzzle, hardware being the other. The hardware to run a decent Gui wasn't cheap enough for mass production until the mid 80's or so. The Alto, if produced commercially would have been as successful as the Apple Lisa. But Maybe, we could have had a jump start on software for Gui's. And just maybe Xerox would have produced a follow up to the Alto that would have been cheaper, similar to what Apple did to produce the Mac.
Slashdot Mirror
SQL Express is not the same. Its like suggesting a Smart car is a good substitute for a F1 Race car. Yes, they may have a simular manufactorer and interface, but come on.
How do you use MS SQL Server for free?
I would defintely not suggust taking time reading science fiction.
1) Read OWASP
2) Choose Tools/Technologies
3) Read OWASP
4) Design counter measures for OWASP Top Ten
5) Read OWASP
6) Test Tools/Technologies with counter measures enabled
7) Read OWASP
So sad, that this isn't the first non-troll post. Its the most obvious first place to start. There are more specifics that can be delved into, but if you aren't starting with their guidelines, eck!
Personal attack aside, I think I understand your first point. He provided reasons why you would call someone a label, by also applying that label to the policies. Forgive me, If I don't like the circular nature of that line of reasoning.
Second, I don't hink you read all of my post. There are policies like the individual mandate that were considered "conservative" a few years ago. The term is ill defined as its pretty much used to simply describe policies and people that they don't like without having to describe why. And that's what bugs the ever loving crap out of me. Why is the only thing that is important. Not the labels. Using ill defined labels for decision making, results in poor decisions.
I think you just proved mine. Rather than having a legitimate debate about the roles of government, republicans are keen to just to point something they don't like and say " that's liberal". The world is not quite so binary. Some ideas sucha s the individual mandate, I assume you are obliquely refering to, were strongly suported and even proposed by those that would then and even now call themselves "conservative".
What is a liberal or a socialist?
It seems from the republican side, those are names for anyone you disagree with, but don't want to explain why.
What do you mean by "big"?
Do you mean:
"big"==" well known companies who use godaddy"
Or
"big"==" companies that have a large number of domanis and related services from godaddy" ?
Because there are people/companies with thousands of domains, which they could pull from godaddy and make a noticible dent in their profits instantly by making the switch, but they wouldn't inspire anyone else to do the same.
However wikimedia, may only have a few domains and services, but inspire others to do the same.
Really? Hmm... I guess I never really look at the stupid images in a story or really anywhere online. Usually, just stick to text.
Really? As a technical person, I'd never heard of imgur. Too many places to get or put images for a non image freek to keep track of.
Neither one, but both: we are all users and people that are used. Didn't you listen to pop music in the eighties? Sweet Dreams ring a bell? How about an image of Marlyon Manson riding a pig while wearing a tutu? Anything?
The world isn't digital, its analog.
Yup, sucks maybe a year or two off of your life every time anyone reads that and adds it to mine. Circlue of life and what not.
Well, I'd probably remove the spelling errors, or at start a new viral spelling system that matched those misspellings to make you seem more edgy.
To synergize our leveragables into a new cloud based paradygmn, we'll need a new solutions oriented IT team to create some actionables to create a win-win in reducing internal friction and increase efficiencies to enable the monitization of our empowered workforce.
I agree, because the state of the art isn't fool proof yet. Until everyone on the street can encrypt and decrypt messages safely and securely, you'll have to know how it works.
On a side note, Cell phones might be a good example of a mature encryption system, except its not end to end or very secure. But people don't have to know about GSM encryption or keys or anything else. They are just protected in the transmission of their call from their handset to the carrier. Of course the encryption's been broken for a while, and government agencies just tap into the carrier itself to listen. But secure decryption should be so pervasive and easy to use that it requires nothing of the end user.
But uhm... don't bomb the sears tower. Its mostly empty. Leave it as an example of America's failed economic system. Sears Roebuck built it as a head quarters based on predictions of growth that proved to be unrealistic. Eventually the moved out to the burbs and built a new complex that they are considering abandoning to go back to the city, where they would build a different building for their headquarters.
Ignore the other losers that responded "I don't care about it". The whole point is there may be others that would find cyrptogrophy to be "boring" or "Not interesting".
I, on the other hand, am actively trying to learn everything about baseball, my car's engine, and pro wrestling. They are interesting, everything is. Unfortunately that kinda limits my time for investigating them, so I don't know everything about them, but research them when I am presented an opportunity to. I know a lo about cryptography because the tools are still immature, requiring a bit more understanding of how they work. Like cars were in 1905.
Well, The whole idea was to get large groups of people to switch from their pagan religion to the Christian. Greatest, easiest way to do that? Gradually. By co-opting the date and some of the existing traditions the new religion goes down easier. Soon, people aren't worshipping mother earth, but Jesus Christ. And isn't that the whole idea if you want to spread Christianity? Even furthermore, If there is only one God, the father, son, and holy spirit, then all religions share a portion of truth as they worship the God that they know. So their traditions also share an element of truth in them.
So its kinda funny to hear people ( usually Jahovah's witnesses) say Oh that's not christian its pagan! Well, duh. We did that on purpose.
Yeah, the WTC was not the worlds tallest building in 2001. Hadn't been since they built the sears tower in 1973.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sears_tower
New wave isn't techno. Pink Floyd is 70's psychedelic, IMHO. That's exactly who I had in mind.
What is geek paraphernalia? 1980's posters telling you that "Computers don't Byte?" Or a road sign that says " this way to the information super highway!". Ugh, eck. Wrong.
Do it like it was done unto me.
Put some vim posters, and maybe sections of kernel.h printed on ye old'e green and white.
And make the room dark and foreboding. Loop 1980's new wave bands intermixed with psychedelic 60/70's. No natural light, sections of light banks that can be independently turned on and off as to provide just enough light to make out each other and the obstacles around you. Bonus points if more than one tube flickers and sends sparks intermittently.
Develop some rituals for the students, some incantations to the mighty computers. Sell copious amounts of energy drinks and high sugar snacks on the down low to your students to buy better equipment than the school board provides and give them super human coding skills.
Worked well enough for me and my cohorts.
OpenSuse.
The same could be argued against cutting Public Radio or the national endowment of the arts funding. Every cut you make will be a drop in the bucket. Every tax raised may also be a drop in the bucket. But, but collecting those drops into a bucket, it gets filled up.
There isn't a good argument to not raise taxes on the higher income brackets. Just hand waving and mumbling about "job creators".
Is it too much to really ask for compromise? Some Tax raises and some cuts?
True. Its also true that cutting governmental spending may decrease the amount of revenue they get in with the current tax base.
Exactly. Software is one part of the puzzle, hardware being the other. The hardware to run a decent Gui wasn't cheap enough for mass production until the mid 80's or so. The Alto, if produced commercially would have been as successful as the Apple Lisa. But Maybe, we could have had a jump start on software for Gui's. And just maybe Xerox would have produced a follow up to the Alto that would have been cheaper, similar to what Apple did to produce the Mac.