Well how would Dell or should we say MS cope with this.
Floppies are needed for server etc.
What am I talking about. Since NT's introduction everytime you install the a NT OS you will be greeted by a message saying some thing like "Hit F6 now to install 3rd party mass storage drivers"
This is needed if your HDD's are sitting on a controller that is not supported by the native drivers within NT install.
But the thing is, that when you need to feed the installtion with this 3rd party driver, then it will only look for the driver at A:, so how the hell would Dell redirect it to a CD, USB or whatever??
They can sue in court for non-payment of the bill, which they'll probably lose, because there was never an agreement from the "buyer" to pay for the wares of the "seller".
They can, of course, not sue for non-payment of the bill, and instead, sue for civil copyright infringement. That suit, they might win.
This is actually interesting. APG is in fact (AFAIK of ealier news) a private organization and not created by the Danish Government.
This action from APG only secures the victims (sorry my lack of sympathy to programmers and artists), that APG will not make a lawsuit regarding copyrights.
This means that if BSA did surveillance of Kazaa and eDonkey like APG, they could make lawsuit regarding copyrights to people who already have made a settlement with APG.
Slashdot Mirror
Well how would Dell or should we say MS cope with this.
Floppies are needed for server etc.
What am I talking about. Since NT's introduction everytime you install the a NT OS you will be greeted by a message saying some thing like "Hit F6 now to install 3rd party mass storage drivers"
This is needed if your HDD's are sitting on a controller that is not supported by the native drivers within NT install.
But the thing is, that when you need to feed the installtion with this 3rd party driver, then it will only look for the driver at A:, so how the hell would Dell redirect it to a CD, USB or whatever??
They can, of course, not sue for non-payment of the bill, and instead, sue for civil copyright infringement. That suit, they might win.
This is actually interesting. APG is in fact (AFAIK of ealier news) a private organization and not created by the Danish Government.
This action from APG only secures the victims (sorry my lack of sympathy to programmers and artists), that APG will not make a lawsuit regarding copyrights.
This means that if BSA did surveillance of Kazaa and eDonkey like APG, they could make lawsuit regarding copyrights to people who already have made a settlement with APG.